In Florida, non-competition and other restrictive covenant agreements are enforceable to the extent they are tailored to protect a legitimate business interest. On September 14, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court held that a company’s relationships with business referral sources may
Restrictive Covenant Report
A blog on restrictive covenants, trade secrets, and unfair competition for employers
The Restrictive Covenant Report, published by Jackson Lewis P.C., focuses on legal developments and regulatory changes related to restrictive covenants in employment agreements. The blog covers topics such as non-compete agreements, no-poach agreements, garden leave provisions, and geographic and temporal limitations on restrictive covenants. It tracks legislative updates across various states, including new laws affecting healthcare practitioners and physicians, and analyzes the impact of these laws on employer and employee rights. The blog also discusses court interpretations and enforcement trends, providing insights into how restrictive covenant laws evolve and affect workforce mobility and employer protections.
Latest from Restrictive Covenant Report - Page 9
Kansas Decision Highlights The Perils Of Overreach In Restrictive Covenant Agreements
In a recent decision examining Kansas non-compete law, the United States District Court for the District of Kansas partially granted a company’s motion to enjoin its former employee’s violations of the non-compete and customer non-solicitation provisions of his employment agreement.…
Nevada’s All-New Non-Compete Statute
Once again, Nevada has re-written the landscape the law regarding enforcement of post-employment non-competition agreements. Please see the article posted on our website, written by Elayna J. Youchah and Joshua A. Sliker of our Las Vegas office. They analyze Assembly…
Nebraska Court Enforces Forum Selection Clause
Nebraska’s legal history on the enforceability of non-compete agreements is usually a surprise for employers who view Nebraska as pro-business. Nebraska courts routinely invalidate employee non-compete agreements that venture beyond restricting the employee from doing business with and soliciting customers…
State and Federal Trade Secrets Claims Upheld By Northern District of Illinois
A May 11, 2017 decision by Judge Chang, in the Northern District of Illinois, found misappropriation alleged under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and the Illinois Trade Secrets Act (ITSA), in a case where the employee downloaded files while…
Texas Pre-Suit Discovery – Obligations Under Unusual Procedure Clarified
Although most employers are very familiar with the usual discovery process of litigation, they may not be as familiar with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure’s Rule 202, which concerns pre-suit depositions. Rule 202 can be used, for example, by…
What Does it Mean to “Modify” an Unenforceable Non-Competition Covenant Under Georgia’s Restrictive Covenants Act?
Selective Enforcement Not A Viable Defense to Non-Competition Agreements Under Ohio Law
Employers sometimes worry whether seeking to enforce their non-competes in some circumstances but not others might preclude enforcement altogether in the future. Not so, says one court. Applying Ohio law, the United States District Court for the Western District of…
Federal District Court In Missouri Raises Doubts Concerning Whether At-Will Employment Is Consideration For A Non-Compete Agreement
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, in Durrell v. Tech Electronics, Inc., 4:16-CV-01367 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 15, 2016), held that an at-will employee’s non-compete agreement may not be enforceable where the only form of consideration…
White House Continues Attack on Non-Compete Agreements
The assault on non-compete agreements has continued in a significant way, as outlined in our web article, White House Continues Attack on Non-Compete Agreements. The latest White House document, coupled with prior reports from the White House and Treasury…
