In a recent post-trial decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that a corporation breached its certificate of incorporation by conditioning payment of merger consideration on a stockholder’s execution of a joinder agreement that included a broad release of claims.
Sidley Austin Blog
The Sidley Austin Blog, published by Sidley Austin LLP, focuses on developments in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), corporate governance, and related litigation. It covers topics such as securities litigation, corporate charter and bylaw provisions, shareholder rights, whistleblower complaints, board responsibilities, jurisdictional issues in corporate disputes, and fiduciary duties of directors. The blog analyzes recent court decisions, regulatory enforcement actions, and best practices for corporate governance and compliance. It provides insights into Delaware Court of Chancery rulings and other significant cases affecting corporate law and shareholder litigation.
Latest from Sidley Austin Blog - Page 2
Facts, Not Labels: The Limits of Delaware Notice Pleading
In Caerus Group, LLC v. Chemicar Europe NV, No. 2025-0393-BWD, 2026 WL 668208 (Del. Ch. Mar. 10, 2026), the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a strong reminder that notice pleading does not mean no pleading. Vice Chancellor David dismissed claims…
Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Stockholder Claims as Derivative, Unripe, and Untimely
On April 13, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed all 12 claims asserted in The Gregory M. Raiff 2000 Trust v. Jenzabar, Inc., 2026 WL 992587 (Del. Ch. Apr. 13, 2026). Some claims were exclusively derivative, some were unripe,…
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Limits on Hypothetical Bylaw Challenges
On April 29, 2026, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of consolidated challenges to advance notice bylaws adopted in 2023 by each of The AES Corporation and Owens Corning (In re The AES Corporation and…
Sidley Highly Ranked in Securities Litigation by Chambers USA 2026
We’re honored to share that Sidley’s Securities and Shareholder Litigation team has been recognized in Chambers USA 2026, earning five practice area rankings and more than 20 lawyer rankings across Sidley’s national platform.The post Sidley Highly Ranked in Securities Litigation…
Fake Corporate Records, No Control: Court of Chancery Rejects Control Claim Under Section 225
In Berg v. Bar Lavi, the Delaware Court of Chancery rejected a claim of control in a Section 225 proceeding where the plaintiff relied on documents the Court found were fabricated. After trial, the Court concluded that the purported stock…
When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY Decision
As companies increasingly integrate generative and agentic AI into core business functions, a May 7, 2026 decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York1 highlights several fundamental guardrails for corporate legal and compliance departments to…
Texas Corporate Litigation Reforms Take Hold: Federal Court Enforces Texas’s 3% Ownership Requirement for Derivative Claims
Last summer, the Texas legislature enacted sweeping amendments to the Texas Business Organizations Code (TBOC) with the stated purpose of “modernizing” the code and “clarifying and strengthening” the state’s corporate law framework. See our previous post for an overview of…
Who Started It? Delaware Court of Chancery to Address Whether Contacting DOJ Is ‘Initiating’ a Proceeding in Advancement Case
On March 6, 2026, Magistrate Wright of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a report which underscored Delaware courts’ well-established preference for the enforcement of advancement rights, especially in cases involving broadly drafted provisions. In doing so, the Magistrate addressed…
Bad Investments, Not Bad Faith: Caremark Claims Have Limits
In its recent decision in Marchner v. B. Riley Financial, Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery reaffirmed the principle that Caremark cannot be used to repackage hindsight attacks on failed investments as fiduciary breaches. The court explained that directors’…