In September, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed a lawsuit by minority shareholder United Atlantic Ventures, LLC (“UAV”) against Trump Media and Technology Group Corp. (“TMTG”), the operator of social media platform Truth Social, and several other individual Defendants, including
Sidley Austin Blog
The Sidley Austin Blog, published by Sidley Austin LLP, focuses on developments in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), corporate governance, and related litigation. It covers topics such as securities litigation, corporate charter and bylaw provisions, shareholder rights, whistleblower complaints, board responsibilities, jurisdictional issues in corporate disputes, and fiduciary duties of directors. The blog analyzes recent court decisions, regulatory enforcement actions, and best practices for corporate governance and compliance. It provides insights into Delaware Court of Chancery rulings and other significant cases affecting corporate law and shareholder litigation.
Latest from Sidley Austin Blog - Page 4
Get Your Story Straight: Inconsistency in Plaintiff’s Allegations & Theories Dooms Complaint
This past summer, in a decision that attracted little attention, Vice Chancellor David in the Delaware Court of Chancery tossed Joel B. Ritchie v. G. Leonard Baker et al., a shareholder derivative suit filed on behalf of Corcept Therapeutics,…
Potential Control Won’t Do: Court of Chancery Confirms Common Law Standards for Actual Control Regarding Challenged Transactions
Recently, in Witmer v. Armistice Capital, LLC, Delaware’s Court of Chancery dismissed a stockholder plaintiff’s derivative suit against Armistice Capital, LLC, a large investor in Aytu Biopharma, Inc., for, among other things, purported breaches of fiduciary duty and aiding…
Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Derivative Challenge to The Trade Desk CEO’s Compensation Award Valued at $819 Million for Lack of Demand Futility
In re The Trade Desk, Inc. Derivative Litigation demonstrates the careful analysis the courts will engage in a Rule 23.1 demand futility challenge to assess both director independence and the likelihood of liability for the claims against the directors.
The…
Congress Must Resolve PSLRA Issue For Section 11 Litigants
By Bruce R. Braun & Tommy Hoyt
Uncertainty in Section 11 securities litigation has grown following the Supreme Court’s Slack v. Pirani decision and ambiguities in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). The PSLRA grants judgment reduction credits when outside directors settle, but its silence on other Section
…
California Supreme Court Holds Right to Jury Trial Does Not Bar Enforcement of a Delaware Forum Selection Clause
On July 21, 2025, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in EpicentRX v. Superior Court, reversing a decision by the California Fourth District Court of Appeal that declined to enforce a forum selection clause in a corporation’s certificate…
How Three Years of the Universal Proxy Card Rules Have Changed Proxy Contests
On September 1, 2022, the SEC universal proxy card (UPC) rules took effect, allowing shareholders to freely “mix and match” from among management and dissident nominees in contested director elections. Before the rules’ adoption, their impact on shareholder activism was…
2025 Proxy Season: Temporary Disruption Amid Structural Shifts in Shareholder Activism
Derek Zaba and Kai Liekefett, co-chairs of Sidley’s Shareholder Activism and Corporate Defense practice, discuss the 2025 proxy season and give a shareholder activism outlook for the second half of the year.
What Happens With the Former Board, Stays With the Former Board: Delaware Court Dismisses Claims Against Directors for Failing to Investigate Past Misconduct
In a recent dismissal of all claims in Borsody v. Gibson, the Delaware Court of Chancery grappled with an unusual set of circumstances involving a former director who believed he had been wrongfully removed from a board and prevented…
Gutterball Claims: Delaware Court Rejects Contract and Fraud Claims in the Face of Fair Disclosures
In a recent post-trial opinion in BBP Holdco, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation, the Delaware Superior Court addressed an unusual M&A dispute. After a spin-off of one of Brunswick’s bowling divisions, the buyers claimed that they had been defrauded not…