In keeping with a broad global trend, the Indian Patent Office has refused Dr. Stephen Thaler’s patent application which sought to recognise Dr. Thaler’s AI system DABUS as the inventor of a ‘food container and devices and methods for attracting
Spicy IP
Spicy IP, published by Spicy IP, focuses on intellectual property law in India, covering topics such as patent prosecution, patent litigation, inventive step and novelty analysis, and the interpretation of patent law provisions like Section 3(d). The blog also addresses issues related to pharmaceutical patents, data exclusivity debates, trade secrets protection, and the impact of technology on IP rights. It features detailed case analyses, discussions on regulatory developments, and insights into the intersection of IP law with public policy and innovation. Additionally, Spicy IP includes interviews and podcasts with IP practitioners, providing perspectives on legal education and career paths in IP law.
Latest from Spicy IP - Page 6
AIR-1, Right of Publicity-0: Delhi HC’s CLATastrophic Mix-Up

This post is co-authored with Dr. Aakanksha Kumar. Dr. Aakanksha Kumar (She/Her) is an independent researcher and academic who also consults with content creators and advises Chhattisgarhi music artists on copyright-related matters. Previously, she served as Associate Professor, Associate Dean,…
SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 13 – April 19)

Entering the second half of April with a post on the ANI v OpenAI, judgment of which has been reserved by the Delhi HC. Can an entity that is no longer a registered copyright society continue to demand licensing fees?…
Repair, Remove, Replace: DHC saves the Repair Industry

The question of whether a refurbisher, after repairing a product, can remove the affixed mark and replace it with his own has generated a lot of discussion on this blog. Last year, in a post, I had showed how…
ANI v OpenAI: Not Everything an LLM Does is Copyright Infringement
With judgment now reserved in ANI v OpenAI, India stands at the cusp of what might be its first major judicial reckoning with the copyright implications of generative AI. The case raises foundational questions on whether AI systems merely process…
DHC Stunts the Growth of Dynamic Injunctions, Demands the Legislature to Step In

On 16 March 2026, a single bench (SB) of the Delhi High Court (DHC), in Mahindra and Mahindra Limited v. Diksha Sharma, provided a decisive inflection point in the evolution of dynamic injunction jurisprudence in India. The case started…
From Delhi to Bombay, Music Licensing Goes Off the Beat

A lot has been happening with the repertoire of sound recordings that Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) claims to own and manage. It is being used in saree showrooms, a group of 94 restaurants, high profile pubs and bars…
SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (13.04.2026)
Welcome back to another week of Bells & Whistles.
As always, we’ve rounded up a mix of developments, opportunities, and thoughtful reads from across the IP world along with a Bell of the Week that’s well worth revisiting.

Bell of…
SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 6 – April 12)

Entering the second week of April announcing the faculty line up for the SpicyIP Summer School 2026! Two-part post on the purpose of copyright in academic work in the context of Sci-Hub litigation. Another post discussing whether trademark law can…
(Part II) Right Without Duty: Academic Copyright, the Publisher’s Juridical Fiction, and the Case for an Ex Ante Reading of Section 52
Continuing the discussion on the Scihub litigation, in Part II of their post, Rishabh Upadhyay and Pragati Upadhyay turn to the August 2025 order as a vantage point to examine what the litigation has, so far, failed to do. They…