A May 2026 Texas Business Court ruling in Plains Pipeline v. Arrowhead Gulf Coast Holdings reinforces that survival period deadlines and exclusive remedy clauses may be enforced as written under Texas law.
In Pradera SFR, LLC v. American Housing Ventures, the Texas Business Court reaffirmed that a plaintiff’s pleadings generally control jurisdictional challenges to the amount in controversy, drawing a line between jurisdictional analysis and the merits of a dispute.
In DrinkPAK, LLC v. PR III/Crow Building C, LP, the Texas Business Court clarified when the 30-day removal deadline begins to run, holding that courts may look beyond pleading language to the underlying contract, transaction value, and pre-suit communications.
In Thompson v. Anchor Capital GP LLC, the Texas Business Court opinion provides insights for businesses navigating contractual relationships, damages proof, and nonwaiver clauses.
Camino Real Developers v. RivenRock serves as an important reminder that Texas LLC membership interests are defined by the governing company agreement.
In The Mark at Weatherford Owner, LLC v. Darwin German, the Texas Business Court’s Eighth Division enforced a contractual put right and clarified how “default” and “payable” are interpreted in commercial agreements.
In Enosis v. Jensen, the Texas Business Court clarified limits on fiduciary duties in manager-managed LLCs and rejected joint venture theory under Texas law.
The Texas Business Court analyzed a Texas LLC agreement’s drag‑along provision, focusing on board approval requirements for membership unit transfers.
A recent decision from the Texas Business Court (First Division) provides guidance on nonwaiver clauses and the importance of defined terms in contract interpretation under Texas law.
