Skip to main content

Statute

CEQA

1,312 published works

  1. Land Use Law Blog

    Appellate Court Draws Line In Sand Requiring CEQA Review Before City Council Enactment of Land Use Measure

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    By William W. Abbott In case you missed the recent legal tremor, be advised that land use practitioners are looking at two appellate districts in conflict with one another over…

  2. Environmental and Climate

    Merced County Board of Supervisors Unanimously Approves the Quinto Solar Photovoltaic Project

    By Thomas Law Group

    On November 6, 2012, the Merced County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the Quinto Solar Photovoltaic Project, certified the Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approved a Solar Benefits…

  3. Technology and AI

    Appellate Court Finds No Issue with the Timing of San Francisco’s Permit Issuance for T-Mobile’s Project

    By Thomas Law Group

    In Wendy Robinson v. City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950, the First District Court of Appeal upheld the City’s approval of T-Mobile’s installation of wireless telecommunication…

  4. Environmental and Climate

    Petitioners Have the Burden of Proof to Establish Substantial Evidence Supporting a Fair Argument that a Project May Have a Significant Effect on the Environment

    By Thomas Law Group

    In an unpublished decision, Agriculture, Business & Labor Education Coalition of San Luis Obispo County v. County of San Luis Obispo, 2012 Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 7948, the Second Appellate District…

  5. Environmental and Climate

    Appellate Court Upholds EIR Given its Discrepancies Are Minor and Present No Risk of Prejudice to the Environmental Review Process

    By Thomas Law Group

    In Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center v. County of Siskiyou (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 184, Siskiyou County (County) approved a project to expand an existing wood veneer manufacturing facility for the…

  6. Land Use Law Blog

    Co-Gen EIR With Limited Range Of Alternatives Upheld

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    By William W. Abbott Roseburg Forest Products Co. operates a wood veneer processing facility in Weed, California. In 2008, the County of Siskiyou approved a permit for the purpose of…

  7. Environment, Land & Resources

    Court of Appeal Decision Highlights Importance of Risk Management in Administrative Proceedings

    By Latham & Watkins

    By Damon P. Mamalakis and Taiga Takahashi In September 2012, the Court of Appeal in Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center v. County of Siskiyou affirmed the approval of a 15…

  8. Land Use Law Blog

    No Commitment, No “Project”

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    In Chung v. City of Monterey Park (October 23, 2012, B233859) ___Cal.App.4th ___, the City Council directed staff to prepare a ballot measure that would require the City to seek…

  9. Land Use Law Blog

    William Abbott to Speak at the CLE International 8th Annual CEQA Conference

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    William Abbott will be speaking at the CLE International 8th Annual Conference on CEQA case law and practice tips, December 13, 2012 in San Francisco. Mr. Abbott will be presenting…

  10. Government and Public Policy

    Court Creates a Split in Authority by Holding a City was Compelled to Place a Voter-Backed Initiative on the Ballot Unless it Could Complete CEQA Review Within Election Law Time Limits

    By Thomas Law Group

    In Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior Court of Tuolumne County (2012) 2012 Cal.App.LEXIS 1138 (Tuolumne Jobs), the Fifth District Court of Appeal clarified that an effort by…