Skip to main content

Statute

CEQA

1,311 published works

  1. Land Use Law Blog

    Limited Discretion Related to Aesthetics did not Trigger Need for Supplemental EIR on Climate Change Impacts

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    The City of San Diego was not required to conduct supplemental environmental review on the issue of climate change, where the only discretionary action was limited to the aesthetics of…

  2. Land Use Law Blog

    Basin Plan Amendments Addressing Impairments for Salt, Boron and Dissolved Oxygen are Valid

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    Regional Board TMDLs for Salt/Boron and Dissolved Oxygen Upheld by Third Appellate District.

  3. Land Use Law Blog

    The Long Life of CEQA Mitigation Measures

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc., William W. Abbott

    By William W. Abbott The shelf life of mitigation measures may readily outlast the lives of the projects to which they are attached, according to the First Appellate District. While…

  4. Land Use Law Blog

    Put a Lid on It: EIR for Open Air Human Waste Composting Facility Held Invalid

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    The California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, ยง 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA") provides that the purpose of an environmental impact report ("EIR") is "to provide public agencies and the…

  5. Land Use Law Blog

    898,000 Metric Tons of Unmitigated CO2: Prime Conditions for the First Appellate Court Decision on CEQA and Climate Change

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    In the first ever appellate court decision regarding CEQA and climate change, the First District Court of Appeal held the future development of a plan for greenhouse gas mitigation constitutes…

  6. Real Estate, Land Use & Environmental Law Blog

    Notice Of Exemption Triggers A 35-Day Statute Of Limitations Under CEQA Despite Flaws in Underlying Approval

    By Sheppard Mullin

    Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton _____ Cal. ___ (April 1, 2010, No. S159690) By Phillip Tate On April 1, 2010, the California Supreme Court unanimously ruled…

  7. Real Estate, Land Use & Environmental Law Blog

    Vested Rights Under Prior Permits Do Not Establish CEQA Baseline

    By Sheppard Mullin

    By Claudia Gutierrez Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management District et al. ___Cal.__) (March 15, 2010; Case No. S161190) In this case, the Supreme Court…

  8. Land Use Law Blog

    Regents’ CEQA Document Receives a Passing Grade; Opponent Marked Down for Inadequate Participation

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    Appellate court affirms range of alternatives in EIR for facility expansion as sufficient; bars additional claims for plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

  9. Land Use Law Blog

    No Fooling: A Facially Valid NOE Triggers a 35-Day Statute of Limitations

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    In the second time in two months, the California Supreme Court announced that once a Notice of Exemption ("NOE") for a project is filed, the applicable statute of limitations is…

  10. Land Use Law Blog

    Subsequent EIRs: It is Still a Matter of the Evidence in the Record

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    An amendment to a prior commercial center approval which permits construction of a supercenter does not, by itself, mandate the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR.