Skip to main content

Statute

Wiretap Act

57 published works

  1. Inside Class Actions

    Use of AI Call Center Without Consent Not a Federal Wiretap Violation, Court Holds

    By Kathryn Cahoy, Libbie Canter, Thea McCullough

    As businesses increasingly deploy AI-powered call centers to streamline customer service, plaintiffs have turned to decades-old wiretapping laws to challenge these tools. In a recent decision, however, an Illinois federal…

  2. Workplace Privacy, Data Management & Security Report

    Florida’s Digital Wiretapping Surge: What Businesses Need to Know About FSCA Litigation

    By Joseph J. Lazzarotti, Ena T. Diaz

    A blend of evolving judicial interpretation, aggressive plaintiffs’ counsel, and decades-old statutory language has brought new life to the Florida Security of Communications Act (FSCA) as a vehicle for challenging…

  3. Inside Class Actions

    Arbitrator Rejects Website Wiretapping Claims After Hearing

    By Jordan Joachim

    In a recently published award, an arbitrator rejected claims that Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (“Dick’s”) violated the Federal Wiretap Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) by purportedly…

  4. Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider

    Trap and Trace Claims: Plaintiffs Target Website Search Bar Data Under Wiretap Laws

    By Kathryn Rattigan

    Lawsuits are rapidly multiplying against website operators over how user information is collected and shared. Plaintiffs are increasingly creative in asserting that website tracking tools, especially those tied to search…

  5. Inside Class Actions

    California Court Dismisses Hotel Website Wiretapping Suit Based on “In Transit” Requirement

    By Jordan Joachim

    Recently, a California federal judge dismissed a suit alleging that Sojern, Inc., a travel marketing platform, violated the Federal Wiretap Act and California law by allegedly installing “tracking technology” on…

  6. Class Action Defense Blog

    Hospital Defeats Wiretap Adtech Class Action After Texas Federal Court Finds No Knowing Disclosure Of Protected Health Information

    By Gerald L. Maatman Jr.

    By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Justin Donoho, and Hayley Ryan Duane Morris Takeaways: On September 22, 2025, in Sweat v. Houston Methodist Hospital, No. 24-CV-00775, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185310…

  7. Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider

    Hospital Succeeds in Dismissal of Pixel Litigation

    By Linn Foster Freedman

    Recently, the United States District Court in the Southern District of Texas granted summary judgment for the defendant hospital in Sweat v. Houston Methodist Hospital, No. 4:24-cv-00775 (S.D. Tex. 9/22/25).…

  8. Global Policy Watch

    Court Clarifies Federal Wiretap Act’s Crime-Tort Exception: “Commercial Purposes” Are “Not the Stuff of Which a Crime-Tort Is Made”

    By Austin Riddick, Matthew Verdin

    After last year’s landmark ruling holding that the Massachusetts Wiretap Act does not prohibit businesses’ use of pixels to capture website browsing data, Massachusetts plaintiffs have shifted their focus to…

  9. Global Policy Watch

    Website Wiretapping Litigation: Recent Decisions and Developments

    By Kathryn Cahoy, Libbie Canter, Matthew Verdin

    Website analytics and advertising tools, such as pixels, are regularly targeted in lawsuits brought under various wiretap laws, including the federal Wiretap Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act…

  10. Inside Class Actions

    Website Wiretapping Litigation: Recent Decisions and Developments

    By Matthew Verdin, Vivian Wen, Kathryn Cahoy, Libbie Canter

    Website analytics and advertising tools, such as pixels, are regularly targeted in lawsuits brought under various wiretap laws, including the federal Wiretap Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act…