Topic
Injunction
719 published works
Opinions on High
Is the Constitutional Injunction ‘Ordinary’? Smethurst v Commissioner of Police
By Jason N E Varuhas, Professor of Law, Melbourne Law School In Smethurst v Commissioner of Police [2020] HCA 14 the High Court of Australia had to decide whether data…
PrawfsBlawg
Universal v. Nationwide, Again
Main Monday, July 13, 2020Universal v. Nationwide, AgainThe Ninth Circuit affirmed an injunction prohibiting enforcement of DOJ's sanctuary-city regulations as to California and the City and County of San Francisco.…
PrawfsBlawg
Universal v. Nationwide
Main Wednesday, July 08, 2020Universal v. NationwideA good illustration of why the nationwide/universal and where/who distinction matters for the scope-of-injunction question. Here is footnote 28 in Ginsburg dissent in Little…
Lash Condo Law Blog
Disruptive and Violent Condo Owner – A Court Decision on Enforcement
By Sarah Morrey
In a recent case titled Peel Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1028 v. Jakacki (2020) ONSC 3697, the Ontario Superior Court was tasked with deciding whether to grant a temporary injunction…
Delaware Corporate & Commercial Litigation Blog
Chancery Determines Amount of Bond for Injunction
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery letter ruling determined the amount of a bond for an injunction entered in connection with a suit to enforce a non-competition agreement. The matter…
PrawfsBlawg
Avoiding universality, again
Main Thursday, June 18, 2020Avoiding universality, againThe DACA decision again avoided the scope-of-injunction issue and the propriety of universal/non-particularized injunctions, in a clever way. The Court consolidated three cases--two (from…
Libation Law Blog
Fizzy… oops, I mean Brizzy, hard seltzer maker files opening brief in appeal of trademark injunction ruling in favor of Fizzy… darn, I mean Vizzy, Molson Coors’ brand hard seltzer. (Bonus: we’ve got the brief for you)
Just so we’re not fuzzy on the issues – this is an appeal of the District Court’s denial of Future Proof’s request for a preliminary injunction against Molson Coors. Future…
Supreme Court Update
South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom (No. 19A1044), Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC (No. 18-1334), GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC (No. 18-1048), Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A (No. 17-1712), Banister v. Davis (No. 18-6943), Nasrallah v. Barr (No. 18-1432)
By Tadhg Dooley, David R. Roth
It’s an understatement to say that goings on at One First Street have been overshadowed this week by unrest further down Constitution Ave. (and around the country). Nevertheless, it was…
Italy Intellectual Property Blog
Heraeus v. Biomet: in application of the proportionality principle the Court of Milan grants a one-year “grace period” for a final injunction to take effect
Towards the end of last year, the Court of Milan issued a decision in a high-profile trade secrets case whereby it granted a one-year “grace period” for a final injunction…
Simple Justice
Tuesday Talk*: Enjoined, For Their Own Good
One might reasonably believe with all the passion one can muster that no rational person would choose to be homeless, to live under a freeway overpass, to risk contracting coronavirus…