Topic
Standing
1,072 published works
Drug & Device Law
Spokeo – Half a Loaf, Maybe More, from the Supreme Court
By Bexis
We can’t stand no-injury class actions – brought by plaintiffs who allege only that “I got exactly the product I paid for, and wasn’t hurt, but for X reason I paid…
Other
Spokeo May Raise the Bar for Standing in ADA Title III Cases
By John W. Egan
Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Spokeo decision may lead to more careful scrutiny of whether ADA Title III plaintiffs have a sufficiently “concrete” injury to confer jurisdiction in…
Technology Law Dispatch
Federal Judge in Maryland Remands Data Breach Class Action Following in Spokeo Decision’s Footsteps
By Sulina D. Gabale, Michael O'Neil, Paul Bond
Just days after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. Robins, the highly anticipated decision is already impacting data breach class actions across the country. The defendant in the Spokeo…
Hunton Retail Law Resource
Will Spokeo Undermine CAFA?
As we previously reported, the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo v. Robins has been nearly universally lauded by defense counsel as a new bulwark against class actions alleging technical violations…
Energy & Environmental Law Adviser
Environmental Injuries Must Be “Concrete” and “Particularized” to Confer Standing to Sue in Federal Court
By J. Michael Showalter, Alex Garel-Frantzen
On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court clarified that a plaintiff must allege an injury in fact that is both concrete and particularized to establish standing to sue…
HL Chronicle of Data Protection
Justices Rule That Injury In Fact Must Be Concrete, Requiring More Than A Statutory Violation
By HL Chronicle of Data Protection
On Monday, May 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its highly anticipated opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, a case that examined the question of whether…
Sixth Circuit Appellate Blog
Standing on Shifting Ground in the Sixth Circuit
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court remanded Spokeo v. Robins to the Ninth Circuit on grounds that Article III requires “concrete” harm in order to maintain an action in federal…
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Concrete and Particularized Part II: What Spokeo May Mean for Class Actions
By Rand L. McClellan, Keesha N. Warmsby
This blog post is the second in a series of posts that Baker & Hostetler LLP is devoting to the significant decision Robins v. Spokeo, No. 13-1339, 537 U.S. ___…
Workplace Safety and Environmental Law Alert Blog
Does the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. Robins Change the Standing Requirements for Pursuing Environmental Citizen Suit Claims?
By Michael Fucci, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Andrew H. Perellis and Patrick D. Joyce Seyfarth Synopsis: U.S. Supreme Court: mere violation of a statute creating a private right of action is not itself sufficient to satisfy…
Class Defense Blog
Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Try to Spin Spokeo
A peculiar thing happened after the Supreme Court announced its decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (pdf) on Monday. Even though the Court ruled in favor of Spokeo—vacating the Ninth Circuit’s ruling…