Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Plaintiffs Respond To The Petition For Certiorari In Dukes v. Wal-Mart

By Gerald Maatman, Jr. on November 8, 2010
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In what is perhaps the closely watch cert petition in the employment law context in years, counsel for plaintiffs have filed their opposition to the petition for certiorari in Dukes, et al. v. Wal-Mart, an en banc ruling of the Ninth Circuit upholding certification of a class of more than a million current and former female workers who allege they were discriminated against.  Plaintiffs obviously argue that the Supreme Court should not accept the petition and that the Ninth Circuit’s class certification order should be upheld. Plaintiff assert that the writ should be denied because the decision is interlocutory and fundamental questions remain unresolved pending a trial. By last count, there are now 10 amicus briefs filed with the Supreme Court too.

The petition is now ripe for review by the Supreme Court, and most expect action either way on the petition by November or December. Stay tuned.

Photo of Gerald Maatman, Jr. Gerald Maatman, Jr.

Gerald is a partner in the Wage & Hour Litigation Practice Group in Seyfarth Shaw’s Chicago office. Mr. Maatman has a primary emphasis in his practice on defending employers sued in employment-related class actions and EEOC pattern and practice lawsuits brought in federal…

Gerald is a partner in the Wage & Hour Litigation Practice Group in Seyfarth Shaw’s Chicago office. Mr. Maatman has a primary emphasis in his practice on defending employers sued in employment-related class actions and EEOC pattern and practice lawsuits brought in federal and state courts throughout the United States. Mr. Maatman also pioneered the process of conducting employment practices audits to assist employers in structuring effective and practical personnel policies and protocols. These audits are designed to minimize the incidence of employment-related class action litigation and to maximize management discretion and workplace productivity. Mr. Maatman’s work in this area has been profiled in the Wall Street Journal and Time Magazine.

Read more about Gerald Maatman, Jr.Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Class Action & Mass Torts, Employment & Labor
  • Organization:
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo