Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Can Employees Be Required to Take Lie-Detector Tests?

By Michael Miller on October 3, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Under Minnesota law, employees cannot be required to take lie-detector tests, but they may volunteer to do so.  Minnesota law prohibits employers from directly or indirectly soliciting or requiring “a polygraph, voice stress analysis, or any test purporting to test the honesty of any employee or prospective employee.”  See Minn. Stat. § 181.75.  It is also unlawful for anyone to sell or interpret lie-detector tests of employees or prospective employees if the individual knows that the lie-detector tests have been solicited or required by an employer.
Lie-detector tests may be administered by employers only in the rare situation in which an employee requests a polygraph test.  When this occurs, Minnesota law requires that the employer must inform the employee that taking the test is voluntary.  However, the employer may not tell anyone that the test was administered to the employee because Minnesota law prohibits anyone from disclosing the fact that another person has taken a polygraph or honesty-test, except to the individual tested or persons authorized by the individual to receive the results.  See Minn. Stat. § 181.76.

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Minnesota Employer
  • Organization:
    Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo