Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Court Lowers Burden of Proof for OSHA

By Mark A. Lies II on January 12, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

By Mark A. Lies, II and Meagan Newman

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a decision that effectively and measurably lowers OSHA’s burden of proof to establish an OSHA violation to “what a reasonably prudent employer would do.” Compass Environmental, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Commission; Department of Labor, No. 10-9541 (Dec. 19, 2011). The decision is contrary to the Review Commission’s long-standing four-part Atlantic Battery test and establishes no measurable criteria for an employer to use to determine what is required and whether the employer is compliant. An analysis of the decision is available here.

Photo of Mark A. Lies II Mark A. Lies II
Read more about Mark A. Lies IIEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Workplace Safety and Environmental Law Alert Blog
  • Organization:
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo