Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Non-Unionized Financial Services Employer Found to Have Violated NLRA by Having Overbroad Confidentiality, Non-Disclosure, and Non-Disparagement Provisions in Employment Agreement

By Lauri F. Rasnick on January 17, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

By: Lauri F. Rasnick

At our October 2012 client briefing we discussed the new attitude of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) and the fact that non-unionized employers were not immune from the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”).  The NLRA has been increasingly applied in non-union workplaces.  And most recently, it has found its way into the financial services industry.  In a recent NLRB administrative law judge’s decision, provisions contained in a mortgage banker’s employment agreement were found violative of the NLRA.  The provisions at issue are fairly typical in financial firms’ agreements – confidentiality and proprietary information and non-disparagement.  These are the types of provisions commonly employed to protect a company’s valuable assets and its reputation.  Our Advisory discusses the decision in depth and what it means for employers.

Read the full version on ebglaw.com.

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Workforce Bulletin
  • Organization:
    Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo