Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

EEOC Settles Its First GINA Case: Request for Employee’s Family Medical History Violates Law

By Charla Bizios Stevens on May 16, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) announced on May 7, 2013 the settlement of the first case it filed under the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (“GINA”).  The case was brought against Fabricut, one of the world’s largest distributors of decorative fabrics.  The suit alleged that Fabricut violated both the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and GINA when it refused to hire a woman who was believed by the Company to have carpal tunnel syndrome.

The applicant had worked for Fabricut as a temporary employee for ninety days and then applied for a regular position with the Company.  After an offer of employment was extended, the applicant was sent to the Company’s designated medical clinic for a pre-employment drug screen and physical.  When she appeared for the examination, she was required to provide a complete medical history which sought information concerning her family’s history of exposure to a laundry list of medical conditions ranging from high blood  pressure and heart disease to “mental disorders”.

In addition to seeking the medical history, the examiner expressed a concern  that the applicant was suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome and needed further evaluation.  The applicant was sent  to her own physician who concluded after administering several tests that she did not have the condition.  Nevertheless, Fabricut rescinded the offer of employment.

The EEOC alleged that requesting the family medical history was in and of itself a violation of GINA even in the absence of evidence that the answers contributed to the decision to rescind the offer.  The ADA was also violated because the applicant was “regarded as” suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome,  and an adverse employment decision was made as a result.

Employers should make certain that those to whom they delegate responsibility for pre-employment screening are not  asking unpermitted questions about the applicant’s family medical history.  Simply seeking this information will be considered by the EEOC at least, to be actionable discrimination.

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Employment Law Business Guide
  • Organization:
    McLane Middleton
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo