Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Should Hospitals Require Mandatory Drug And Alcohol Testing For Doctors?

By Kathryn J. Barry on May 24, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

If pilots and commercial truck drivers are subject to federally mandated drug and alcohol testing, why aren’t doctors?  According to an article recently published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, they should be. 

At least one in ten doctors will suffer from drug or alcohol addiction at some point during their career.  Despite these statistics, however, the American Medical Association has never required doctors to undergo drug or alcohol testing, either before beginning employment or following an unexpected patient death or injury.  And, unlike other high-risk industries, no federal agency or other regulatory body has ever mandated profession-wide testing. 

In their April 29 article, Drs. Julius Cuong Pham and Peter J. Pronovost, patient safety experts at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland (with Dr. Gregory E. Skipper of Promises Treatment Center in Santa Monica, California contributing),  argue that drug testing could have a wide variety of positive effects on the profession.  “Patients might be better protected from preventable harm.  Physicians and employers may experience reduced absenteeism, unintentional adverse events, injuries, and turnover, and early identification of a debilitating problem.”  While Johns Hopkins is among a small number of hospitals that requires doctors undergo drug testing as a condition of employment, it is not an industry-wide practice.  Drs. Cuong, Pronovost and Skipper believe that should change.    

The article recommends a number of steps, the first of which includes implementing an AMA-created and accredited testing body.  The testing body could then oversee a variety of testing standards for all AMA accredited hospitals, which would include requiring: mandatory physical examinations and drug screening before medical staff are appointed to a hospital; random drug and alcohol testing; and, testing all physicians involved in a patient’s unexpected death or injury. 

In cases where a doctor is found to be impaired, the article recommends the hospital suspending or revoking his privileges and, in some cases, reporting positive drug and alcohol tests to the state licensure board.  Any doctor found to be practicing while under the influence would be required to undergo treatment and routine monitoring as a condition for returning to practice.

Photo of Kathryn J. Barry Kathryn J. Barry
Read more about Kathryn J. BarryEmail
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Drug and Alcohol Testing Law Advisor
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo