Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Tennessee Takes Shot at NLRB in New Law Limiting Franchisor Liability

By John P. Rodgers on June 16, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Tennessee Takes Shot at NLRB in New Law Limiting Franchisor LiabilityFranchisors in Tennessee can breathe a small sigh of relief thanks to a newly enacted state statute that seeks to limit their potential liability and strike back at the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board.

Last year, the NLRB’s general counsel filed complaints against McDonald’s franchisees and McDonald’s franchisor, arguing that the two were joint-employers. If joint-employers, then the franchisor would potentially have to defend itself for the conduct of the local franchisees and, importantly for organized labor, union formation would be facilitated. The change, if accepted by the NLRB, would fundamentally transform the franchise business model. The NLRB has not yet determined whether it will accept the general counsel’s broader joint employer test or continue to use the joint employer test it has used for the past 30 years, which is much more favorable to franchisors.

The Tennessee General Assembly responded this year, passing a statute expressly stating that a franchisee’s employees shall not be considered employees of the franchisor for any purpose absent a voluntary agreement between the U.S. Department of Labor and the franchisee. The law went into effect on April 10, 2015. This means, if an employee of a franchisee tries to claim that the franchisor is also his employer in employment-related litigation under Tennessee law, the franchisor can argue that it is not the employer as a matter of law and cite the newly enacted state statute to try to avoid any liability.

It is questionable what effect the law would have, if any, in a case before the NLRB if the NLRB adopts the general counsel’s position. The NLRB would be considering who is a joint employer under the National Labor Relations Act and interpreting caselaw, not Tennessee law. As a result, the law’s effect would likely be minimal at best before the NLRB, but it could have an affect in Tennessee employment litigation involving franchises.

The International Franchise Association and the Chamber of Commerce’s Workforce Freedom Initiative are lobbying several states to adopt similar legislation to Tennessee’s, according to news reports.

Photo of John P. Rodgers John P. Rodgers

John Rodgers represents public and private employers in employment-related litigation and assists them with employment policies, employee handbooks, workplace investigations, disciplinary actions, and terminations. He actively litigates employment disputes on behalf of employers and has handled discrimination and retaliation, wage and hour, FMLA…

John Rodgers represents public and private employers in employment-related litigation and assists them with employment policies, employee handbooks, workplace investigations, disciplinary actions, and terminations. He actively litigates employment disputes on behalf of employers and has handled discrimination and retaliation, wage and hour, FMLA, and non-compete cases in both state and federal court. He also devotes substantial attention to ERISA litigation and representing individuals and businesses in conservatorship matters.

Read more about John P. RodgersEmailJohn's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Insights
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo