Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Oregon Tightens the Screws on Noncompetes: 18 Months Will Soon Be the Maximum Period of Restriction

By Ed Piper & Amy Joseph Pedersen on June 30, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As we blogged about earlier, courts in most states just plain don’t like employee noncompete agreements. Particularly when it comes to mid- and low-level employees, courts worry that enforcing a noncompete agreement will hamper innovation, restrict competition, and unfairly burden a former employee’s ability to earn a living. For that reason, a court typically will review an noncompete’s justification, scope, and length with the judicial equivalent of a fine-tooth comb.

Courts have been picking away at the enforceability of employee noncompetes for years, but more recently, legislatures have jumped into the mix with varying levels of aggressiveness. California has long banned noncompetes outright, and several other states either have followed suit (e.g., North Dakota) or are considering whether to pass similar laws (e.g., Massachusetts, Washington). Still others have adopted laws that make it easier for employers to enforce noncompetes (e.g., Georgia), or are considering whether to do so to remedy past judicial reticence in the area (e.g., Wisconsin).

Oregon, however, sits somewhere in the middle.  Pursuant to ORS 653.295 it allows employee noncompetes, but only subject to certain statutory restrictions. Until now, one such restriction was that the duration of the noncompete could be no more than two years. As we blogged about with respect to other areas, though, Oregonians like not to be outdone in areas in which other states also are active. So, Governor Kate Brown recently signed House Bill 3236, which reduced the permissible term of an employee noncompete from two years to 18 months. The legislative history indicates that the Oregon Legislature passed the law based largely on the longstanding critique that employee noncompetes are detrimental to innovation.

The new law applies only to noncompetes entered into after January 1, 2016, so your current employee noncompete agreements won’t be affected by it. Remember, though, that courts in Oregon and elsewhere have long required that, above all, noncompetes be reasonable. Many courts are loathe to “bluepencil” or modify an overbroad noncompete agreement, so make sure you comply with all requirements of the law.

Photo of Ed Piper Ed Piper

Ed Piper is a technology-focused employment lawyer. He advises clients in all aspects of labor and employment law (including both counseling and litigation) and focuses on guiding employers through the intricacies of the ever-evolving digital workplace. He has experience in matters involving misappropriation…

Ed Piper is a technology-focused employment lawyer. He advises clients in all aspects of labor and employment law (including both counseling and litigation) and focuses on guiding employers through the intricacies of the ever-evolving digital workplace. He has experience in matters involving misappropriation of trade secrets, data security, employee privacy, non-competition and non-solicitation agreements, and employment-related antitrust issues.

Read more about Ed PiperEmailEdward's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Amy Joseph Pedersen Amy Joseph Pedersen

Amy Joseph Pedersen is senior counsel to the Labor & Employment section of the Litigation group, focusing exclusively on employment litigation and counseling, primarily on the employer’s side of a dispute but, on occasion, also representing executives and executive groups. Amy has substantial…

Amy Joseph Pedersen is senior counsel to the Labor & Employment section of the Litigation group, focusing exclusively on employment litigation and counseling, primarily on the employer’s side of a dispute but, on occasion, also representing executives and executive groups. Amy has substantial trial experience in state and federal courts, as well as in administrative proceedings and arbitration, in all areas of employment law including discrimination and wage class actions. She also has significant experience in noncompetition and nonsolicitation agreement negotiation, drafting, and enforcement litigation; and workplace investigations.

Read more about Amy Joseph PedersenEmailAmy Joseph's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    World of Employment
  • Organization:
    Stoel Rives LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo