Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The Other Border Patrol

By Brent Lorentz on November 20, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

With all the flaming rhetoric going on these days relating to immigration, refugees, and border fences, I thought now might be a good time to introduce (or reintroduce) the world to a heavy hitter in the intellectual property border patrol:  the International Trade Commission.  I suspect few people know specifically what the ITC can do, or  the broad implications of the ITC’s power.  Please consider this a free introductory course.

Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. sec. 1337, the ITC is given the authority to investigate, among other things, alleged infringement of various intellectual property rights by importers.  The most common investigations by the ITC generally include patent or trademark infringement.  The proceedings are similar to litigation in the courts, but they move substantially faster and do not rely on juries for decisions.  A possible result of an investigation is that importers will be barred from continuing to import products which are deemed to infringe any properly established rights.  This is merely a high-level overview of how the process works, but based on the end result (barring imports), you can easily see how significant the ITC is.  In proper cases, it can simultaneously eliminate a market for a producer and eliminate a product for consumers.

The Federal Circuit recently considered a very important case relating to the ITC power which very few people are actually talking about.  However, the implications of the case are very important.  In the recently decided ClearCorrect case, the Federal Circuit held that the ITC did not have the authority to bar importation of digital data.  The Federal Circuit based its decision the grounds that the ITC was only allowed to bar importation of “articles,” which the Federal Circuit construed to mean “material things.”

It remains to be seen whether the Federal Circuit decision will ultimately result in a good or bad result.  On the one hand, as our digital and information economy continues to expand, it seems that barring digital imports will eventually be a necessary component of protecting intellectual property rights within the U.S. market.  On the other hand, I could easily see such a task over-burdening the ITC and giving the ITC more power now than Congress envisioned.  But this is one of those interesting legal issues where it will pay to stay tuned.  It’s possible that Congress will elect to expand ITC authority, or even come up with an entirely new mechanism for dealing with the problem.

 

Brent Lorentz

View my professional biography

Sitting here, composing a profile for a blog on creativity and the law, I can’t help but recognize the irony of my overwhelming writer’s block. But, here we go…Although I wish I could say my path to the law…

View my professional biography

Sitting here, composing a profile for a blog on creativity and the law, I can’t help but recognize the irony of my overwhelming writer’s block. But, here we go…Although I wish I could say my path to the law was the result of a lifelong dream or calling, it was more the result mere curiosity and an affinity for leather-bound books. My gravitation towards intellectual property law, specifically, was probably less accidental, given the immeasurable impact of being a college student during the Napster® era. I’m the product of a modest, small-town Minnesota upbringing combined with some polish from a diverse educational background. I received my engineering degree from the University of North Dakota and then, on a whim, moved to North Carolina to attend law school at Duke University. The drastic temperature swing was certainly not the only difference between the two locales, and come to think about it, the only real similarity is probably the word “North.”

An engineer by training, I appreciate both quantitative and qualitative valuation. These two concepts collide head-on in IP law, creating what is, in my humble opinion, the most entertaining and exciting area of law. As we move towards an information-based economy, the laws which govern the incentivization, protection and distribution of information will only become more important.  I see IP law as the front line.

When I’m not focusing on the law, I can typically be found (WARNING: stereotype coming) on the golf course. I also enjoy skiing (downhill and water). Unfortunately, as is the case with most hobbies, my skill level has not yet caught up to my enthusiasm. Perhaps when I retire…

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    DuetsBlog
  • Organization:
    Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo