Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

‘Implied Certification’ Theory Under the False Claims Act to be Reviewed by U.S. Supreme Court

By James Martin, Colin Wrabley & M. Patrick Yingling on December 17, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, No. 15-7, to review the “implied certification” theory of liability under the False Claims Act.  In recent years, that theory has been applied in a wide variety of circumstances with increased frequency, exposing defendants to substantial damages and penalties.  Because of this, the Supreme Court’s decision could result in significant changes to the scope of False Claims Act liability.

For more information on this topic, please click here.

Photo of James Martin James Martin
Read more about James MartinEmail
Photo of Colin Wrabley Colin Wrabley
Read more about Colin WrableyEmail
Photo of M. Patrick Yingling M. Patrick Yingling
Read more about M. Patrick YinglingEmail
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Reed Smith LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo