Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Fair Use’s Jedi Knight

By Brent Lorentz on December 18, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This isn’t necessarily new news, but I thought it deserved a post regardless.  Back in late November, Google announced a new policy of pushing back against copyright holders issuing DMCA takedown notices regarding videos which Google believes make “fair use” of copyrighted material.  In Google’s words:

We are offering legal support to a handful of videos that we believe represent clear fair uses which have been subject to DMCA takedowns. With approval of the video creators, we’ll keep the videos live on YouTube in the U.S., feature them in the YouTube Copyright Center as strong examples of fair use, and cover the cost of any copyright lawsuits brought against them.

Hear, hear!  It appears that Google is taking seriously it’s changed corporate motto, which went from the passive “Don’t Be Evil,” to the active “Do the Right Thing” at the same time Google changed its corporate structure and put everything under the Alphabet umbrella.

Of course, it’s refreshing to see and it is “the right thing” for Google to stand up for fair use.  But let’s not be naïve.  This is undoubtedly a shrewd and calculated move for a company whose bread and butter is not creating its own content, but rather enhancing accessibility of content generated by others.  Google’s best known offerings other than search and website infrastructure–which themselves depend on content generated by others–are YouTube and Google Books.  Both depend heavily on a relaxation of traditional copyright norms and/or an expansion of fair use.  And this is BIG business-YouTube generated about $4 billion in revenue last year and will likely surpass that this year.

Fortunately, Google’s self interest in this case aligns with what I believe is the public interest.  Gigantic copyright holding organizations have, for too long, been able to throw their substantial weight around without any meaningful resistance.  The expense of litigation coupled with the possibility of life-destroying damages (or even imprisonment) authorized by the Copyright Act (seriously, copyright infringement can be punished more severely than violent crime), have allowed copyright holders to steam roll legitimate fair use, and they’ve had no qualms about the carnage.  We have been long waiting for someone to bring balance to the Force, and Google can fill this role.  In addition to the policy described above, they’ve also put together some nice materials on YouTube that make Copyright law accessible to the general public.  Consider me a fan, for now.

Brent Lorentz

View my professional biography

Sitting here, composing a profile for a blog on creativity and the law, I can’t help but recognize the irony of my overwhelming writer’s block. But, here we go…Although I wish I could say my path to the law…

View my professional biography

Sitting here, composing a profile for a blog on creativity and the law, I can’t help but recognize the irony of my overwhelming writer’s block. But, here we go…Although I wish I could say my path to the law was the result of a lifelong dream or calling, it was more the result mere curiosity and an affinity for leather-bound books. My gravitation towards intellectual property law, specifically, was probably less accidental, given the immeasurable impact of being a college student during the Napster® era. I’m the product of a modest, small-town Minnesota upbringing combined with some polish from a diverse educational background. I received my engineering degree from the University of North Dakota and then, on a whim, moved to North Carolina to attend law school at Duke University. The drastic temperature swing was certainly not the only difference between the two locales, and come to think about it, the only real similarity is probably the word “North.”

An engineer by training, I appreciate both quantitative and qualitative valuation. These two concepts collide head-on in IP law, creating what is, in my humble opinion, the most entertaining and exciting area of law. As we move towards an information-based economy, the laws which govern the incentivization, protection and distribution of information will only become more important.  I see IP law as the front line.

When I’m not focusing on the law, I can typically be found (WARNING: stereotype coming) on the golf course. I also enjoy skiing (downhill and water). Unfortunately, as is the case with most hobbies, my skill level has not yet caught up to my enthusiasm. Perhaps when I retire…

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    DuetsBlog
  • Organization:
    Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo