Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

What’s Union Membership Got to Do with It? Nothing, According to a Proposed Alabama Constitutional Amendment

By Summer Austin Wells on February 10, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

What’s Union Membership Got to Do with It? Nothing, According to a Proposed Alabama Constitutional AmendmentRepublican state legislators recently introduced parallel bills that would amend the Alabama Constitution and reiterate Alabama’s status as a right to work state. Right to work states recognize and protect an employee’s right to choose whether to join or financially support a union. Although Alabama is already a right to work state, and has been for decades (see Ala. Code § 25-7-6), half of states (including California, New York, Kentucky, and Illinois) are not.

The proposed amendment to the Alabama Constitution would declare Alabama’s public policy that prohibits denial of the right to work based on membership in a labor union.  If enacted, the amendment would also explicitly state that employers could not condition employment or continuation of employment on the payment of dues, fees, or other charges to any kind of labor organization. The proposed amendment, however, cuts both ways – it prohibits employers from requiring its employees to abstain from union membership as a condition of employment.

The proposed constitutional amendment does not change the law in Alabama, but serves as additional support for Alabama’s stance on the right to work issue amid an active and union-friendly NLRB and an unresolved U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court must decide whether state government workers who choose not to join a union should be required to pay a portion of union dues.

In a nutshell, the proposed constitutional amendment would put to rest any question of where Alabama stands: membership (or nonmembership) in a labor union has nothing to do with the right to work in Alabama.

Photo of Summer Austin Wells Summer Austin Wells

Summer Austin Wells is a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Group and her practice is primarily focused on employment litigation as well as advising clients on a broad range of topics from day-to-day employment questions to drafting employment policies and procedures.

Summer Austin Wells is a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Group and her practice is primarily focused on employment litigation as well as advising clients on a broad range of topics from day-to-day employment questions to drafting employment policies and procedures. Summer’s labor and employment practice is diverse and includes developing and implementing litigation strategy in a variety of labor and employment matters, including claims of discrimination and retaliation under Title VII, § 1981, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and claims under the Family Medical Leave Act. With experience in a wide variety of employment litigation disputes, Summer represents clients in a broad range of employment matters around the country. View articles by Summer

Read more about Summer Austin WellsEmailSummer's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Insights
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo