Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The New Biennial Budget: Trick or Treat?

By Alan E. Lieberman & Louis B. Schatz on November 27, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Connecticut was the last state in the country to adopt a budget, more than 120 days after the commencement of the current fiscal year.  The biennial budget for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019 was the result of bipartisan negotiations between Democrat and Republican legislators, which largely excluded the participation of Governor Malloy.  The Governor signed the bill on October 31, 2017, but simultaneously published a letter that both praised and excoriated the legislation, and which provided for a line item veto of certain of its provisions.  Halloween was a fitting date for the signing, as the budget contains its fair share of tricks and treats for taxpayers.

From a broader structural perspective, the budget purports to put into effect new spending cap restrictions and limitations on the issuance of general obligation bonds.  The legislation fortunately does not provide for an increase in the Connecticut personal income tax marginal rates or the sales and use tax rate, and does not authorize municipalities to collect an additional sales and use tax.  The budget does, however, call for the transfer of funds and funding from a number of other sources within the state government that presage the need for additional structural changes to better assure the state’s future financial stability.  Last week the General Assembly adopted technical changes to the budget to address certain of the Governor’s concerns, and that legislation was signed today. The recent projection of a $203 million deficit for the current fiscal year has led to pressure for the General Assembly to again come into special session to repair the state budget.

Both the regular and extended special legislative sessions witnessed the enactment of significant tax-related legislation.  In the case of the Connecticut personal income tax, the angel investor tax credit is made available for investments in companies in all industries, the exemption for Social Security benefits is expanded, the property tax credit is further limited, and pension and annuity payments are the subject of both a new limited exemption and a tax withholding requirement.  The due date for the corporation business tax return is pushed back, the scheduled FAS 109 deduction arising out of the implementation of combined unitary reporting is both delayed until 2021 and extended from seven to 30 years, and two new programs for the use of stranded state research and development tax credits are created.  The effective period of sales tax permits is reduced from five to two years, and new enforcement mechanisms are developed for delinquent taxpayers.  The budget legislation increases fees and miscellaneous taxes, such as the cigarette and tobacco products taxes, lowers the insurance premium tax and creates a new brownfields revitalization tax benefit program.  Finally, the DRS is authorized to create a Fresh Start Program whereby certain delinquent taxpayers can apply for relief from penalties and one-half of the interest that otherwise would be due on state taxes that have not been reported or were underreported.

This Alert summarizes Connecticut tax legislation enacted, court decisions rendered and administrative guidance published by the DRS during 2017.  Please contact a member of our State and Local Tax Practice Group if you have questions regarding the new tax law changes or how they may affect you and your business.

Photo of Alan E. Lieberman Alan E. Lieberman

Alan Lieberman’s practice involves counseling clients on matters involving international, federal, state and local taxation, and representing them in tax-related disputes in administrative and court proceedings. In addition, Alan represents clients in the formation, reorganization, and liquidation of business entities and tax-exempt organizations.

Read more about Alan E. LiebermanEmail
Photo of Louis B. Schatz Louis B. Schatz

Louis Schatz is a partner in Shipman’s Tax and Employee Benefits Practice Group, and Chair of the State and Local Tax Group. From 2007 to 2017, Lou served on the firm’s seven-person Management Committee. He is the past Chair of the Tax Section…

Louis Schatz is a partner in Shipman’s Tax and Employee Benefits Practice Group, and Chair of the State and Local Tax Group. From 2007 to 2017, Lou served on the firm’s seven-person Management Committee. He is the past Chair of the Tax Section of the Connecticut Bar Association.

Lou practices in the areas of federal and State of Connecticut tax with attention to the representation of closely held businesses organized as limited liability companies, partnerships and S corporations; real estate joint ventures; and the representation of taxpayers involved in federal and Connecticut tax controversies (at the audit, appellate and court levels). He is a frequent lecturer on federal and State of Connecticut tax, partnership and limited liability company issues.

Read more about Louis B. SchatzEmailLouis's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    School Law
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo