Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

California Proposes New Legislation Prohibiting Confidentiality Provisions in Settlement Agreements

By Bryan Hawkins on January 5, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In the face of a continuing wave of highly publicized complaints of sexual misconduct in the workplace, California state senator Connie M. Leyva introduced Senate Bill 820.  If passed, this law would prohibit the inclusion of nondisclosure terms in settlement agreements relating to actions alleging claims of sexual harassment or discrimination in the workplace.

California law currently prohibits parties to civil actions seeking damages for certain sexual offenses from including in their settlement agreements any terms preventing the disclosure of factual information related to the action.  As it relates to the workplace, SB 820 would broaden that law by including actions seeking civil damages for sexual assault, sexual harassment, or workplace harassment or discrimination based on sex or failure to prevent an act of workplace harassment or discrimination based on sex.  Unlike existing law, however, SB 820 would permit the inclusion of nondisclosure terms upon the request by the complaining party.

While introduced to address legitimate and reasonable concerns about sexual harassment in the workplace, SB 820 would cause a dramatic shift in the way California employers handle pre-litigation sexual harassment and discrimination complaints by employees.  For example, because the new law would apply only to settlements reached after litigation has commenced, it would pressure employers to settle these types of lawsuits pre-litigation, thereby increasing the value for factually questionable claims.  To the extent a lawsuit is filed, the new law could also potentially deter employers from settling these types of claims due to the public nature of such settlements.

Whether you are an employee or an employer, SB 820 is a law to keep an eye on as it progresses through the legislative process.  Even if it fails to pass, however, California employers must take steps to tackle issues regarding workplace harassment by ensuring that their employees are properly trained in proper workplace conduct and in how to handle and address employee complaints.

Photo of Bryan Hawkins Bryan Hawkins

Bryan Hawkins Bryan Hawkins is a litigator practicing in the firm’s Labor & Employment group with extensive jury and bench-trial experience in representing employers in employment-related litigation in court and before administrative agencies such as the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and…

Bryan Hawkins Bryan Hawkins is a litigator practicing in the firm’s Labor & Employment group with extensive jury and bench-trial experience in representing employers in employment-related litigation in court and before administrative agencies such as the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. His practice also involves counseling employers on employment-related issues, including handbooks and policies. Bryan also provides counseling on labor issues, such as advising employers on how to effectively respond to union organizing campaigns, negotiate collective bargaining agreements, and manage the employer/union relationship. In addition, Bryan’s practice includes litigating complex commercial disputes in areas such as antitrust, business torts, and real estate.

Click here for Bryan Hawkins’ full bio.

Read more about Bryan HawkinsEmailBryan's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    World of Employment
  • Organization:
    Stoel Rives LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo