Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Switzerland Announces ICO Enforcement Action

By Scott H. Kimpel & Mayme Beth Donohue on August 1, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a terse press release issued July 26, 2018, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (“FINMA”) announced that it has launched enforcement proceedings against an ICO issuer based on evidence that the company may have “breached financial market law.” According to FINMA, the proceedings focus in particular on possible breaches of Swiss banking law resulting from the potentially unauthorized acceptance of public deposits. FINMA noted that, in the context of its ICO, the subject company “accepted funds amounting to approximately one hundred million francs from more than 30,000 investors in return for issuing EVN tokens in a bond-like form.”

Switzerland is one of several jurisdictions outside the United States that has offered a “light touch” regulatory approach to cryptocurrency and digital asset regulation in an effort to spur local economic development. But as this case demonstrates, “light touch” is not the same thing as “no touch,” and even offshore regulators’ patience for potential misconduct is not boundless.

On a related note, there continues to be a great deal of misinformation in the crypto marketplace about the ability to evade US jurisdiction by simply incorporating overseas. Irrespective of the jurisdiction of incorporation, an enterprise doing business in the United States, either by maintaining a physical presence here or by marketing to US customers or investors, will usually be subject to oversight by US authorities. Indeed, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) can theoretically assert jurisdiction anywhere in the world, and often does when a company engages in a cross-border securities offering. The SEC is particularly aggressive against bad actors when US investors—irrespective of whether they live stateside or abroad—are harmed.

Furthermore, persons incorporated offshore doing business in the United States can incur significant US tax and other liabilities depending on the nature and structure of their US operations. Likewise, without knowledgeable local advisors, US persons doing business in a foreign jurisdiction may unknowingly incur local tax liabilities or otherwise violate local laws.

  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial, Technology
  • Blog:
    Blockchain Legal Resource
  • Organization:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo