Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Letter from The Editor: E. coli O157:H7 still threatens beef, but not so much

By Dan Flynn on August 26, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
baseballpitcher_1000x565
Opinion

Maybe you haven’t, but upon returning to my seat from the concession stand at a Major League Baseball game when I noticed on the scoreboard that the home team’s pitcher still had not given up a hit going into the 7th inning, I have spoken up about it.

When you do that and you are lucky, the folks sitting nearby will only throw beer at you.

Baseball fans know the rule. You don’t talk about a “no-hitter” while it’s in progress and you are not supposed to make those spontaneous utterances that I have been guilty of on such occasions.

USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has a “no-hitter” of its own in progress.

Massive beef recalls for E. coli O157: H7 by the nation’s major producers were once routine, but are now rare. FSIS would like to keep it that way, but they don’t talk about much for the same reason that you are not supposed to talk about a late-inning no-hitter.

When I crossed paths at IAFP in Salt Lake City last month with Carmen Rottenberg, I asked her about the streak, meaning those one million pound plus beef recalls by major producers over E. coli contamination. The Deputy Under Secretary for Food Safety responded only by looking around for some wood to knock on.

But what about last week, when on Aug. 23 Cargill Meat Solutions in Fort Morgan, CO announced the recall approximately 25,288 pounds of ground beef products for possible E. coli O157: H7 contamination?  Cargill is one of the nation’s top 3 producers, and it recalled beef for E. coli contamination, but 25,288 pounds is a small amount compared to what was normal in  the old bad old days.

Back in 2007, for example in two recalls within a week of each other, Topps recalled 21.7 million pounds of hamburger for E. coli O157; H7.  The 21.7 million pound recall came after another major producer recalled 5.7 million pounds of beef just weeks earlier.

As a “then and now” tail, it’s some contrast. Big beef plants before 2010 were recalling millions upon millions of pounds of E. coli-laced meat from God knows exactly where around the country. Once in a while, even we must acknowledge now is not like the bad old days.

On the morning after Cargill’s recall was announced, Albertsons, Safeway, Pak ‘N Save, and Vons stores were out with lists of stores and products that had received the contaminated beef. The four retailers said any beef they processed in proximity to the Cargill beef was also being recalled.

The four retailers by-the-way issued their information jointly, making it as consumer-friendly as possible. That’s also something we did not see in 2007 and is another sign that business is taking food safety seriously.

The dramatic reductions in E. coil O157: H7 in meat is what deserves more attention. It’s not just the end of the routine massive recalls, but overall positive trends.

In five of eight years since 2010, the number of recalls for O157 were in single digits. In eight recalls last year, less one percent of all recalled product involved E. coli O157: H7.

In 2007, by comparison, 22 recalls for E. coli contamination involved one in every four pounds of the product taken off the market. Meat recalls for E. coli O157: H7 today are more likely to be for a few hundred pounds or this or that, or some mixed meat products.

Small recalls mixed in with an occasional event as large as Cargill’s, but gone are the days when major beef plants were calling back more than a day’s full production. One has to look back to May 19, 2014, for a fresh beef recall for E. coli O157: H7 of more than one million pounds. That was the day that brought Detroit-based Wolverine Packing Company’s 1.8 million pound recall of ground beef for E. coli.

Since that is only four years ago, one has to assume a one million plus pound beef recall is still possible. But for now, let’s celebrate the week past in which there were a producer and some retailers who showed some panache in what they were doing.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)

Photo of Dan Flynn Dan Flynn

Editor Dan Flynn is a Northern Colorado-based writer and editor with more more than 15 years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a…

Editor Dan Flynn is a Northern Colorado-based writer and editor with more more than 15 years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a journalist included working for newspapers throughout the West, from the Black Hills to Seattle. His on-scene reporting on the collapse of the Idaho’s Teton Dam and the suicide bombing at Washington State University’s Perham Hall was carried by newspapers around the world and was recognized both times regionally by the Associated Press for Best Reporting on a Deadline. Most of the disasters he attends these days involve food illnesses.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Food Safety News
  • Organization:
    Marler Clark, Inc., PS
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo