Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Another Interest Deduction Limitation Rule in Dutch Corporate Income Tax Law

By Suzanne Walstra on September 14, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As part of global and European initiatives against tax avoidance, all EU member states are required to incorporate the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) into domestic tax law no later than 1 January 2019. ATAD contains a number of rules in the areas of interest deduction, exit taxation, general anti-abuse, and controlled foreign companies. A formal legislative proposal for the incorporation of ATAD into Dutch tax law will be submitted to parliament on 18 September 2018 (Budget Day).

One of the announced measures is the so-called earnings stripping rule (the Earnings Stripping Rule), which limits the deduction of interest expenses for Dutch corporate income tax purposes in certain circumstances. Such deduction limitation could lead to a higher taxable amount. Based on the Earning Stripping Rule, Dutch companies would only be allowed to deduct “net borrowing costs” if and to the extent these net borrowing costs would not exceed the highest of:

(i)    30 percent of the company’s taxable earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), and

(ii)   EUR 1 million

Net borrowing costs are equal to the company’s annual interest expenses (including any costs related to the loan and currency exchange results), less interest income. As the Netherlands aims to have equal treatment of both equity and debt, it was decided to take a stricter approach than that prescribed by ATAD. Consequently, the Dutch government expressed, inter alia, the intention that there will be no grandfathering for existing loans and that the new legislation will not include a group escape rule.

The flip side is that some of the existing interest deductibility limitation rules may be abolished together with the introduction of the Earnings Stripping Rule. More details will follow in another blog as soon as the legislative proposal has been submitted.

 

Photo of Suzanne Walstra Suzanne Walstra

Suzanne Walstra is a tax lawyer and attorney-at-law. She focuses her practice on national and international tax structures.

Read more about Suzanne WalstraEmail
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    GT Amsterdam Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo