Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Likely FDA Impact of the Government Shutdown: Regulatory Submission Reviews, Inspections, and Research Projects

By Randy Prebula, Philip Katz, David Horowitz, Janice Hogan & Jonathan Kahan on December 27, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
FDA (Food and Drug Administration)

The U.S. government shutdown that began December 22, 2018 affected only about a quarter of federal agencies, because most had already been funded for FY 2019.  Unfortunately, FDA is one of the agencies with at least some functions shut down, as was announced yesterday.  Among other things, FDA has furloughed 42% of its employees, according to a tweet from Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D.  Nonetheless, Dr. Gottlieb said the agency would be “continuing vital activities, to the extent permitted by the law, that are critical to ensuring public health and safety in the United States,” including:

  • Maintaining core functions to handle and respond to emergencies,
  • Supporting high-risk food and medical product recalls,
  • Pursuing civil and criminal investigations when the public health may be imminently at risk,
  • Screening imported food and medical products,
  • Addressing other critical public health issues that involve imminent threats to the safety of human life, and
  • “Mission critical” surveillance for significant safety concerns with medical devices and other medical products.

On the other hand, until legislation making FY 2019 appropriations for FDA is enacted, the agency will not be able to:

  • Accept user fees assessed for FY 2019, or
  • Accept any regulatory submissions for FY 2019 that require a user fee payment and that are submitted during the lapse period.

According to an HHS contingency staffing plan, FDA will “be unable to support some routine regulatory and compliance activities,” including “some medical product, animal drug, and most food related activities.”  The plan says FDA “will also pause routine establishment inspections, cosmetics and nutrition work, and many ongoing research activities.”

Possible Implications for CDER-Regulated Products

The impact on CDER will be similar to the other product Centers that rely on user fees. The biggest impediment will be that FDA will not accept new applications or supplements that require a fee because fees cannot be processed during the lapse period.  Otherwise, the user fee-supported activities will generally continue.  For PDUFA, that includes the broadly defined “process for the review of human drug applications,” under Sec. 735(6) of the Act, which includes the “activities necessary for the review of human drug applications and supplements.” But based on past experience with FDA shutdowns, the absence of a significant portion of the FDA staff, over time, places a strain on CDER drug review activities, which can cause delays that indirectly affect drug review.

Implications for CDRH-Regulated Products

For medical device applications subject to user fees, FDA has communicated that:

  • It will not accept any applications subject to user fees if the user fee has not been paid and fully processed prior to the lapse in funding.
  • It will accept such filings for review if the user fee was paid and fully processed prior to the funding lapse.
  • If the user fee has been paid but not fully processed prior to the funding lapse, the application will be placed on user fee hold until the government reopens and the payment can be fully processed.

Additionally, Hogan Lovells has learned through direct agency discussions that processing of Investigational Device Exemptions is expected to continue.

Some agency correspondence is likely to be delayed, particularly for informal inquiries or those not subject to user fees.  For example, the Office of Combination Products has communicated that it is not able to read or respond to messages until either a FY 2019 appropriation or continuing resolution for FDA has been enacted. Similar communication delays are anticipated among other FDA offices.

In sum, while FDA’s review of pending applications subject to user fees is expected to continue during this partial shutdown, new applications subject to user fees will not be reviewed until such time as a FY 2019 appropriation or continuing resolution for the FDA is enacted and the fee processing office reopens.  Depending on the length of the shutdown, medical product centers may well be looking at a sizable backlog of applications to triage when the agency is fully operational again, not to mention other industry correspondence.  Thus, if the current shutdown persists, industry should anticipate that certain agency delays will likely continue for some time.

With respect to domestic and foreign inspections, it is unclear to what extent the furlough period will impact scheduling of these inspections into 2019.

In a Thursday letter to FDA employees, Dr. Gottlieb expressed sympathy for the challenges that the shutdown would impose on agency staff.  We will continue to monitor and report on how the government shutdown is affecting regulatory work in the U.S.

Tags: Top 10
Photo of David Horowitz David Horowitz

Partner, Washington, D.C.

David Horowitz brings 25 years of combined experience at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the FDA to help clients anticipate and navigate regulatory challenges, and participating in the policy-making process.

As Deputy General Counsel at…

Partner, Washington, D.C.

David Horowitz brings 25 years of combined experience at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the FDA to help clients anticipate and navigate regulatory challenges, and participating in the policy-making process.

As Deputy General Counsel at HHS (2010-2017), David oversaw and coordinated legal services in support of FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and international and emergency preparedness programs. His work focused on FDA regulatory policy and litigation. During his tenure at FDA – which included five years as head of the Office of Compliance for drugs, and three years as Assistant Commissioner for Compliance Policy – David played a leadership role in major initiatives, including the modernization of FDA’s approach to pharmaceutical manufacturing quality and the agency’s efforts to develop and implement a more scientific, risk-based approach to inspection and enforcement.

Over the course of his career at HHS and FDA, David developed substantial knowledge pertaining to FDA law and policy, with particular emphasis on pharmaceuticals, compliance, and the application of administrative law. He also developed a deep understanding of the institutions, organizational structures, procedures, and cultures through which regulatory policy and compliance decisions are considered, developed, and implemented across all branches of government, including Congress and the courts, as well as various components of FDA, HHS, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Justice, and the White House.

Read more about David HorowitzEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo