Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Hungary’s Labor Code Amendments Relax Overtime Limit

By Erika C. Collins & Tony S. Martinez on January 3, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Hungary is in the midst of an emigration crisis that has seen roughly five percent of the country’s working-age population immigrate to other European Union countries in recent years. This mass migration has triggered a labor shortage in the country.

In response to the growing labor crisis, the Hungarian Parliament passed amendments to the country’s labor code. These amendments raise the yearly cap on overtime from 250 to 400 hours per year and permit companies to defer overtime payments to employees for up to three years. The previous deferment period for overtime payments under the law was one year. Additionally, the amendments to the law empower employers to enter into overtime arrangements directly with employees notwithstanding unions and already-existing collective bargaining agreements. The Hungarian Parliament overwhelmingly voted in favor of the amendments, which later were signed into law by President János Áder.

Protests erupted in Budapest over the new law with critics referring to it as the “slave law.” As many as 10,000 protestors took to the streets to demonstrate their opposition to the new law.

Proponents of the bill have stated that the additional overtime will provide those seeking additional work and earnings with a means for attaining it. In addition to providing additional earnings to workers, the law’s ultimate goal, according to proponents, is to attract multinational companies and investors to Hungary.

The law’s future remains uncertain as opposition lawmakers have threatened to seek judicial intervention on grounds that parliamentary procedures were not properly followed while passing the measure.

We will continue to monitor the law and blog about any updates.

Photo of Erika C. Collins Erika C. Collins
Email
Photo of Tony S. Martinez Tony S. Martinez

Tony Seda Martinez is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Labor-Management Relations and Employment Litigation practice groups.

Tony advises clients on a range of labor and employment matters. As part of his employment law practice…

Tony Seda Martinez is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Labor-Management Relations and Employment Litigation practice groups.

Tony advises clients on a range of labor and employment matters. As part of his employment law practice, Tony has represented clients in lawsuits alleging breach of contract, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation before federal and state courts and administrative agencies. He also assists employers with complex investigations matters and provides day-to-day counseling on employment law matters. Tony focuses his labor practice on representing public and private employers in grievance arbitrations and collective bargaining negotiations. He counsels clients across a number of industries including financial services, health care, sports leagues, transportation, and media.

Tony earned his J.D. from Rutgers Law School in 2018 where he was a member of the Rutgers Law Review. From 2022 to 2023, Tony served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable José R. Almonte in the District of New Jersey.

Read more about Tony S. MartinezEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    International Labor and Employment Law
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo