Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Proposed Bad Actor Disqualification Act of 2019 Would Severely Limit the Availability of Waivers for Institutions Entering into Settlements with the SEC and DOJ

By Robin M. Bergen, Matthew C. Solomon, Joon H. Kim & Alex Janghorbani on July 9, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last month, Representative Maxine Waters, Chair of the House Financial Services Committee, introduced a discussion draft of the “Bad Actor Disqualification Act of 2019” (the “Proposed Act”).  Similar to proposed legislation Rep. Waters introduced in 2015 and 2017, the effect of the Proposed Act, if passed, would be to dramatically increase the burdens on institutions seeking waivers from disqualifications under the federal securities laws, including those for Well-Known Seasoned Issuers (“WKSI”), certain exemptions from registering securities offerings, and protection from fraud claims predicated on forward-looking statements.  Indeed—given that the Proposed Act would require that all waiver applications be open to public comment and hearing and vote by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”), and that the Commission be barred from considering the “direct costs” of a denial to the applicant, but rather only the interests of the public, investors, and market integrity—the effect may be to essentially eliminate waiver applications and grants in all but the most severe cases.  The Proposed Act targets “the largest financial institutions on Wall Street,” which, unsurprisingly given their business models, request and receive a disproportionate share of waivers.  However, by its terms the Proposed Act applies more broadly to all issuers and is not limited to financial institutions.

Please click here to read the full alert memorandum.

Photo of Robin M. Bergen Robin M. Bergen

Robin M. Bergen’s practice focuses on government and internal investigations, and regulatory enforcement and examination of broker-dealers and investment advisers.

Read more about Robin M. BergenEmail
Photo of Matthew C. Solomon Matthew C. Solomon

Matthew C. Solomon’s practice focuses on securities enforcement and litigation, white-collar criminal defense, and complex commercial litigation.

Read more about Matthew C. SolomonEmail
Photo of Joon H. Kim Joon H. Kim

Joon H. Kim’s practice focuses on high-stakes litigation and enforcement, including internal investigations, white-collar criminal defense, commercial litigation, regulatory enforcement, and arbitration, as well as crisis management.

Read more about Joon H. KimEmail
Photo of Alex Janghorbani Alex Janghorbani

Alexander Janghorbani’s practice focuses on complex securities issues, litigation and enforcement, informed by nearly nine years of service with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Read more about Alex JanghorbaniEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Cleary Enforcement Watch
  • Organization:
    Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo