Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New Jersey Bill Would Codify a Stricter Version of ABC Test for Determining Independent Contractor Status

By James Hays, Sean Kirby & Myles Moran* on November 14, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On November 7th a bill was introduced in the New Jersey legislature that would, like California’s AB 5 (see our previous blog here), codify a stricter version of the ABC test for determining independent contractor classification. The bill, S4204 (text available here), also affirms New Jersey courts’ use of the ABC test under the state’s unemployment law, Wage and Hour Law, Wage Payment Law, and other contexts.

Similar to California’s AB 5, the New Jersey bill would go much further than merely codifying past practice. Indeed, S4204 would not only codify the ABC test as used by New Jersey courts in the past, it would adopt a stricter version of the ABC test, thereby making it more difficult for companies to classify workers as independent contractors. Under the current version of the ABC test, an individual is considered an employee of the company he or she is working for unless:

  1. The individual is free from control or direction over the performance of services;
  2. The service is either outside the usual course of the business for which it is performed, or the service is performed outside of all the places of business of the enterprise for which it is performed; and
  3. The individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business.

If enacted, S4204 would eliminate the ability for companies to satisfy prong “B” by showing that the work performed by the individual is away from the company’s place of business. In other words, a company would now only be able to satisfy prong “B” by showing that the work performed by the individual is outside of the company’s usual core business. This modified prong “B” is potentially troublesome for any business that uses independent contractors to deliver or provide their core product or service, such as those in the “gig economy.”  S4204 also adds a requirement to prong “C” that the individual must provide the company with the same type of services he or she provides in that profession or trade.

These proposed changes, if enacted, would make it significantly harder for companies to classify individuals as independent contractors. Given the number of employee-friendly laws passed by this legislature, there is a strong possibility that this bill will be passed by the New Jersey legislature. We will continue to monitor S4204 and provide updates as the bill makes its way through the New Jersey legislature.

* Law clerk Myles Moran assisted in the drafting of this article.

Photo of James Hays James Hays

James Hays is of counsel in the firm’s New York office and a leader of the Traditional Labor Law Team.

Read more about James HaysEmail
Photo of Sean Kirby Sean Kirby

Sean Kirby is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s New York Office.

Read more about Sean KirbyEmail
Photo of Myles Moran* Myles Moran*

Myles Moran is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s New York office.

Email
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo