Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Kentucky Supreme Court Declines to Hear Ohio CAT Tax Dispute

By Justin Brown & Open Weaver Banks on February 6, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On December 19, 2019, the Kentucky Supreme Court found in favor of the state of Ohio on its motion to dismiss a suit brought by a taxpayer in Kentucky state court against the State of Ohio. The taxpayer received an assessment for Ohio commercial activity tax (CAT) from the Ohio Department of Taxation, based on its sales of goods that were delivered to Ohio addresses. The taxpayer protested the assessment with the Ohio State Tax Commissioner. One month after filing its protest with Ohio, the taxpayer brought suit against the State of Ohio and the Ohio State Tax Commissioner in Greenup Circuit Court in Kentucky, seeking a declaratory judgment that it was not subject to the Ohio CAT, monetary relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for forced collection of taxes not owed, and a determination under Kentucky law that it would be inequitable to require the taxpayer to defend an action in a foreign state. Ohio filed a motion to dismiss the complaint based on sovereign immunity, qualified immunity, comity, lack of personal jurisdiction, and failure of the taxpayer to exhaust administrative remedies. After the circuit court denied Ohio’s motion to dismiss, Ohio filed an appeal with the Kentucky Court of Appeals, and the Kentucky Supreme Court granted Ohio’s request for a transfer of its interlocutory appeal. The Kentucky Supreme Court reversed the trial court’s order denying Ohio’s motion to dismiss, holding that Ohio is protected by sovereign immunity against claims seeking declaratory as well as monetary relief; the Ohio State Tax Commissioner is immune from suit in his official capacity; and finally, based on principles of comity, the Kentucky Supreme Court dismissed the taxpayer’s claims against the Ohio State Tax Commissioner in his personal capacity. Ohio v. Great Lakes Minerals, Inc., Dkt. No. 2018-SC-000161-TG, 2019 WL 6971565 (Ky. Dec. 19, 2019).

Photo of Justin Brown Justin Brown

Justin Brown assists clients on a variety of state and local tax (SALT) matters, including tax planning, compliance and audit defense. He also counsels on tax restructuring, apportionment and nexus issues.

Before joining Eversheds Sutherland, Justin was a senior tax consultant at a

…

Justin Brown assists clients on a variety of state and local tax (SALT) matters, including tax planning, compliance and audit defense. He also counsels on tax restructuring, apportionment and nexus issues.

Before joining Eversheds Sutherland, Justin was a senior tax consultant at a Big Four accounting firm. There, he prepared and reviewed multistate tax returns and also advised clients on a wide range of SALT matters.

Justin’s previous experience includes serving as an intern clerk for the Honorable George W. Draper III of the Supreme Court of Missouri and a legal intern for an international manufacturer and distributor of computer hardware products based in Taipei, Taiwan.

Read more about Justin BrownEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Open Weaver Banks Open Weaver Banks
Read more about Open Weaver BanksEmail
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    SALT Shaker
  • Organization:
    Eversheds Sutherland LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo