Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Supreme Court Rules Six Year Statute of Limitations Applies to More ERISA Lawsuits

By Joshua Lichtenstein, Dan Ward & David Kirchner on February 27, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On February 26, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the closely watched Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee et al. v. Sulyma case, making it more difficult for employers to seek early dismissal of class actions brought by participants in their retirement plans by narrowing the circumstances where a shorter three-year statute of limitations will apply instead of the standard six-year period. The decision may add further momentum to the ongoing wave of fiduciary breach class actions that have already resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements from plan sponsors. The decision is also noteworthy because it will allow the lower courts to assess the underlying question of whether Intel acted prudently when it decided to include alternative investments (such as hedge funds and private equity funds) in its plans.

Please click here to read the full alert.

Photo of Joshua Lichtenstein Joshua Lichtenstein
Read more about Joshua LichtensteinEmail
Photo of Dan Ward Dan Ward
Read more about Dan WardEmail
Photo of David Kirchner David Kirchner
Read more about David KirchnerEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Disputing Tax
  • Organization:
    Ropes & Gray
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo