Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Uruguay’s inspections of beef and lamb found “equivalent to that of United States”

By Dan Flynn on March 30, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Uruguay exports raw and processed beef and lamb products to the United States, and USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) finds no reason that those shipments cannot continue.

The FSIS performed an on-site equivalence verification audit in Uruguay Dec. 2 to Dec. 13, 2019, without identifying any systemic findings of shortcomings. The final report dated March 19, 2020, was a clean bill of health for the South American country.

“The purpose of the audit was to determine whether Uruguay’s food safety inspection system governing raw and processed meat (i.e. beef and lamb) products remains equivalent to that the United States, with the ability to export meat products that are thermally processed, commercially sterile beef, ready-to-eat (RTE) salt-cured beef; RTE beef fully cooked without subsequent exposure tot he environment; RTE fully cooked beef; RTE fully-cooked beef; RTE dried beef; RTE acidified /fermented beef (without cooking); raw intact beef; and raw intact lamb to the United States,” says the report.

The audit breaks it down into six “equivalent components” including:

  • Government oversight;
  • Government statutory authority, food safety, and other consumer protection regulations;
  • Government sanitation;
  • Government Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) system;
  • Government chemical residue testing programs; and
  • Government microbiological testing programs.

“The FSIS concluded that Uruguay’s meat food safety inspection system is organized to provide ultimate control, supervision, and enforcement of regulatory requirements,” according to the report.

It says Uruguay’s “has implemented sanitary operating procedures and a HACCP system to ensure controls of the food safety inspection system for raw and processed beef and lamb.” Further, the report says Uruguay “has implemented microbiological and chemical residue testing that is organized and administered by the national government to verify the country’s food safety inspection system.”

The FSIS audit says Uruguay’s “central competent authority” for food safety is the General Directorate of Livestock Services, a unit of the Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture, and Fisheries. It was subjected to a “routine ongoing equivalence verification audit.”

FSIS auditors inspected 10 of the 27 establishments in Uruguay that are currently certified as eligible to export meat products to the United States. The FSIS auditors visited one beef and lamb processing and cold storage establishment, two beef and lamb slaughter establishments, and seven beef slaughter and processing establishments.

“During the establishment visits, the FSIS auditors paid particular attention to the extent to which industry and government interacted to control hazards and prevent noncompliance that threatens food safety,” the report said.

FSIS assessed Uruguay’s “ability to provide oversight through supervisory reviews conducted in accordance with FSIS equivalence requirements for foreign food safety inspection systems outlined in Title 9 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (9CFR) 327.2.”

The auditors also inspected microbiology and chemical residue laboratories to verify their technical abilities for the food safety inspection system.

While there were no “systemic findings” to discuss with Uruguay’s officials during the audit exit meeting in Montevideo, the FSIS did share “isolated findings” in the form of checklists for individual establishments they had visited, Uruguay’s food safety officials promised to address those findings.

The “isolated findings” were mostly minor, such as a door seal that was not closing tight and one instance of where beef eligible for export to the U.S. was comingled in a freezer with non-eligible beef

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)

Photo of Dan Flynn Dan Flynn

Editor Dan Flynn is a Northern Colorado-based writer and editor with more more than 15 years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a…

Editor Dan Flynn is a Northern Colorado-based writer and editor with more more than 15 years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a journalist included working for newspapers throughout the West, from the Black Hills to Seattle. His on-scene reporting on the collapse of the Idaho’s Teton Dam and the suicide bombing at Washington State University’s Perham Hall was carried by newspapers around the world and was recognized both times regionally by the Associated Press for Best Reporting on a Deadline. Most of the disasters he attends these days involve food illnesses.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Food Safety News
  • Organization:
    Marler Clark, Inc., PS
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo