Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Maryland Federal Court Denies Attempt to Block Bank of America’s Eligibility Restrictions for Paycheck Protection Program Loans

By Thomas V. Panoff, Christopher Comstock, Laurence E. Platt, Tori K. Shinohara & Stephanie C. Robinson on April 13, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Illustration-Industry_Construction_iStock-1072477030

Today, a federal judge in Maryland denied an emergency motion seeking to block Bank of America from applying eligibility restrictions to its lending under the $349 billion Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). The motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was filed by four small businesses, which had alleged that Bank of America only accepted applications for PPP loans from small business checking customers that were already borrowers at the bank or that were not also borrowers at any other bank. The businesses alleged that these limitations violated the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), which established the PPP, and the Small Business Act (“SBA”).

In a 23-page decision, US District Judge Stephanie Gallagher denied the plaintiff’s emergency motion. Judge Gallagher first found that PPP applicants do not have a private right of action to bring a lawsuit challenging a lender’s conduct under the CARES Act. According to the judge, “[t]he plain language of the statute does not suggest an intent to confer . . . a private remedy against participating . . . lenders.”

In addition, even assuming that PPP applicants have a private right of action against participating lenders, Judge Gallagher found that Bank of America’s “challenged conduct here does not run afoul of the CARES Act.” Although the CARES Act imposes certain limited eligibility criteria for PPP loans, Judge Gallagher found that the Act “does not constrain banks such that they are prohibited from considering other information when deciding from whom to accept applications, or in what order to process applications it accepts.” Judge Gallagher also expressed concern that blocking lenders from applying eligibility criteria to applicants could discourage them from offering loans under the program, which would be contrary to the intent of Congress in passing the CARES Act.

***

If you wish to receive periodic updates on this or other topics related to the pandemic, you can be added to our COVID-19 “Special Interest” mailing list by subscribing here. For any other legal questions related to this pandemic, please contact the Firm’s COVID-19 Core Response Team at FW-SIG-COVID-19-Core-Response-Team@mayerbrown.com.

Photo of Stephanie C. Robinson Stephanie C. Robinson
Read more about Stephanie C. RobinsonEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    COVID-19 Response Blog
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo