Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New Jersey Gives Employers a Break on New WARN Requirements Due to COVID-19

By James Hays, Myles Moran* & Sean Kirby on April 17, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On April 14th New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed Senate Bill 2353 into law. The law delays the application date of the New Jersey WARN amendments passed earlier this year and removes mass layoffs due to COVID-19 from coverage under the statute.

 Coronavirus, Insurance Benefits

As detailed in a prior blog, New Jersey previously enacted a dramatic expansion of its state mini-WARN Act. The amendments, signed into law on January 21, 2020, expanded the statute’s notice requirements, definition of establishment, the counting and coverage of part-time employees, and lowered threshold for mass layoffs. Most notably, the amendments included a mandatory severance requirement. These changes were scheduled to take effect on July 19, 2020. SB 2353 pushes the effective date back to 90 days after the Governor’s stay-at-home executive order is terminated.

Substantively, SB 2353 alters the definition of mass layoff to exclude layoffs due to COVID-19. The amendment excludes layoffs made necessary by fire, flood, natural disasters, national emergency, act of war, and more from the term “mass layoff.” This change is retroactive to March 9th, excluding COVID-19 layoffs made on or after that date from coverage under NJ WARN.

Sheppard Mullin is committed to providing employers with updated information regarding COVID-19 and its impact on the workplace.  Stay informed on legal implications with Sheppard Mullin’s Coronavirus Insights Portal which now aggregates the firm’s various COVID-19 blog posts on a broad range of topics.

As you are aware, things are changing quickly and there is no clear-cut authority or bright line rules.  This is not an unequivocal statement of the law, but instead represents our best interpretation of where things currently stand.  This article does not address other the potential impacts of the numerous other local, state and federal orders that have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including, without limitation, potential liability should an employee become ill, requirements regarding family leave, sick pay and other issues.

*Myles Moran is a law clerk in Sheppard Mullin’s New York office.

*This alert is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice and is not intended to form an attorney client relationship.  Please contact your Sheppard Mullin attorney contact for additional information.*

Photo of James Hays James Hays

James Hays is of counsel in the firm’s New York office and a leader of the Traditional Labor Law Team.

Read more about James HaysEmail
Photo of Myles Moran* Myles Moran*

Myles Moran is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s New York office.

Email
Photo of Sean Kirby Sean Kirby

Sean Kirby is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s New York Office.

Read more about Sean KirbyEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo