Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Required Coverage of COVID-19 Testing for Essential Workers in California

By Alice Hall-Partyka on July 29, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On July 17th, the California Office of Administrative Law (“OAL”) approved an emergency regulation (effective until January 14, 2021) from the California Department of Managed Health Care (“DMHC”) that specifies COVID-19 diagnostic testing coverage requirements for California health care service plans. Medi-Cal managed care plans, Medicare Advantage plans, and specialized health plans are not subject to the regulation. The DMHC provided additional context to the emergency regulation in an all plan letter issued on July 23rd.

The regulation deems COVID-19 testing to be an urgent health care service during the California state of emergency. It also states that COVID-19 diagnostic testing is a medically necessary basic health care service for enrollees who are essential workers, regardless of whether the enrollee has symptoms of COVID-19 or a known or suspected exposure to a person with COVID-19. Essential workers are defined in the regulation to include a broad range of individuals working in the health care, emergency services, public transportation, congregate care, correctional, food service, and education sectors. Additionally, they include individuals who work in retail, manufacturing, agriculture, and food manufacturing that either have frequent interactions with the public or cannot regularly maintain at least six feet of space from other workers.

Between the regulation, all plan letter, and other applicable federal law, California health plans will need to comply with the following requirements for enrollees seeking COVID-19 testing:

1.    Enrollees With Symptoms of COVID-19 or Exposure to COVID-19:

  • The plan cannot impose: (i) utilization management or prior authorization requirements, (ii) cost-sharing requirements, or (iii) limitations on the number or frequency of tests received.
  • Enrollees can receive tests from either in-network or out-of-network providers.

2.   Essential Worker Enrollees Without Symptoms of COVID-19 or Exposure to COVID-19:

  • The plan cannot impose: (i) utilization management or prior authorization requirements or (ii) limitations on the number or frequency of tests received.
  • The plan must offer appointments within 48 hours, at a location within 15 miles or 30 minutes of the enrollee’s residence or workplace. Otherwise, the enrollee can access the test from any available provider, including out-of-network providers (in which case in-network cost-sharing amounts apply).
  • Ordinary cost-sharing requirements can be imposed.

3.   Other Enrollees Without Symptoms of COVID-19 or Exposure to COVID-19:

  • Plan can impose utilization management and prior authorization requirements, and testing is only required to be covered when determined to be medically necessary.
  • Where medically necessary, the plan must offer appointments within 96 hours, at a location within 15 miles or 30 minutes of the enrollee’s residence or workplace. Otherwise, the enrollee can access the test from any available provider, including out-of-network providers (in which case in-network cost-sharing amounts apply).
  • Ordinary cost-sharing requirements can be imposed.

If a health plan experiences difficulty in securing COVID-19 testing appointments for its enrollees due to regional or statewide shortages, it should contact its assigned reviewer at the DMHC.

For the diagnostic testing required under the regulation, health plans need to reimburse testing providers at contracted rates where available, the provider’s cash price (when required by federal law), or otherwise the reasonable and customary value of the services. Health plans also need to comply with Knox-Keene claim payment and submission timeframes and not delay or deny payment.

Any contractual change to delegate risk to a provider for COVID-19 diagnostic testing is considered a material change to the contract and needs to comply with the California provider bill of rights.

Photo of Alice Hall-Partyka Alice Hall-Partyka

Alice Hall-Partyka is a Partner at Crowell & Moring’s Los Angeles office, where she is a member of the firm’s Health Care Group. Alice counsels payers, providers, and technology companies on a broad range of health care regulatory, corporate, and policy matters. Alice

…

Alice Hall-Partyka is a Partner at Crowell & Moring’s Los Angeles office, where she is a member of the firm’s Health Care Group. Alice counsels payers, providers, and technology companies on a broad range of health care regulatory, corporate, and policy matters. Alice uses her industry experience to help clients identify practical solutions and navigate complex regulatory frameworks.

Alice advises health care companies that are adapting to evolving laws and regulations, developing new products or services, or seeking to improve their regulatory compliance. She also strategizes with and represents clients that are responding to governmental inquiries and investigations. Alice’s areas of focus include Medicaid and Medicare program requirements, mental health parity, health reform, state regulation of payers and providers, digital health and innovative technologies, and health care fraud and abuse.

Read more about Alice Hall-PartykaEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Health Law
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo