Skip to content

Menu

ChannelsPublishersSubscribe
LexBlog, Inc. logo
LexBlog, Inc. logo
ProductsSub-MenuBlogsPortalsTwentySyndicationMicrositesResource Center
Join
Search
Close
Join the Movement. Blog 4 Good

Illinois Legislature Seeks to Limit Use of Restrictive Covenants

By Steven J. Pearlman, Edward Young & Dakota D. Treece on February 23, 2021
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn

Two bills were recently introduced in the Illinois legislature that seek to limit or preclude the use of restrictive covenants for Illinois employers.

First, on February 19, 2021, the Illinois House of Representatives introduced House Bill 3066 (accessible here), which seeks to eliminate the use of non-competition and non-solicitation restrictive covenants against Illinois employees unless certain salary thresholds and notice requirements are met.  More specifically, if passed, the bill would amend the Illinois Freedom to Work Act (820 ILCS § 90) to:

  • Prohibit the use of covenants not to compete unless the employee’s actual or annualized earnings exceed $75,000 per year;
  • Prohibit the use of covenants not to solicit (both employee and client non-solicitation restrictions are included) unless the employee’s actual or annualized earnings exceed $45,000 per year;
  • Render covenants not to compete and covenants not to solicit unenforceable unless employers: (i) advise employees to consult with counsel before agreeing to the restrictive covenant; and (ii) provide an employee with a copy of the covenant at least fourteen calendar days before the commencement of the employee’s employment; and
  • Prevent employers from enforcing covenants not to compete against any employee who is terminated or furloughed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, or under any circumstances that are similar to the COVID-19 pandemic, unless the employee receives compensation equivalent to his or her base salary during the enforcement period minus compensation earned elsewhere during the enforcement period.

The bill also has a fee-shifting provision.  It would allow an employee to pursue reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs if the employee prevails in a lawsuit brought by an employer to enforce a covenant not to compete or a covenant not to solicit.

Second, on February 22, 2021, the Illinois House of Representatives introduced House Bill 3449 (accessible here), which also seeks to amend the Illinois Freedom to Work Act. Significantly, this bill seeks to prohibit the use of covenants not to compete for all Illinois employees, regardless of an employee’s salary, which are entered into after the date the bill were to become law.

We will continue to monitor developments relating to these proposed laws.  In the meantime, Illinois employers would be well-advised to begin reviewing whether and how the proposed laws may impact their use of restrictive covenants going forward.

Photo of Steven J. Pearlman Steven J. Pearlman

Steven J. Pearlman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation Group. Steven’s practice focuses on defending complex employment litigation involving claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation; wage-and-hour laws; breach of employment contract…

Steven J. Pearlman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation Group. Steven’s practice focuses on defending complex employment litigation involving claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation; wage-and-hour laws; breach of employment contract; and restrictive covenants (e.g., non-competition agreements). Steven is also at the forefront of defending whistleblower retaliation claims, and routinely conducts investigations arising from whistleblower reports. He has successfully tried cases to verdict in Illinois, Florida and California, and defended what is reported to be the largest Illinois-only class action in the history of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. He has also testified in defense of his investigations in federal court.

Read more about Steven J. PearlmanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Edward Young Edward Young

Edward “Eddie” C. Young is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation and the Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Groups.

Eddie’s practice focuses on defending companies in all aspects of employment litigation, including…

Edward “Eddie” C. Young is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation and the Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Groups.

Eddie’s practice focuses on defending companies in all aspects of employment litigation, including claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation, breach of restrictive covenants (e.g., noncompetition and nonsolicitation), and whistleblower retaliation. He has handled such cases before state and federal courts throughout the country, as well as before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Illinois Department of Human Rights, the American Arbitration Association and the Department of Labor.

Read more about Edward YoungEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Dakota D. Treece Dakota D. Treece
Read more about Dakota D. TreeceEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Law and the Workplace
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Stay Connected

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers

Company

  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service

Products

  • Products
  • Blogs
  • Portals
  • Twenty
  • Syndication
  • Microsites

Support

  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Tax Controversy & Financial Crimes Report
  • Roberts Disability Law Blog
  • Animal Law Update
  • International Labor and Employment Law
  • Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog
Copyright © 2021, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered By LexBlog