Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Anatomy of a Beer Label: Part II

By Daan Erikson & Emily Lyons on August 4, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Hand opening a bottle of beer

Aside from the regulatory requirements imposed on beer labels, as discussed in the Anatomy of a Beer Label: Part I post on COLAs, brewers should consider protecting the trademarks featured on their beer labels.

Trademarks

Since every brewer has a brand, consumers most commonly encounter brewers’ trademarks in the form of a brand name or logo.  Trademarks serve as source identifiers to distinguish the origin of goods and services and avoid consumer confusion.  Typically, a trademark may be a word, phrase, design, or a combination of such items, though trademarks may also protect sounds, colors, and smells under certain conditions.  For a beer label, trademark law is best suited to protect the brewery name, sub-brand or inventive beer name, and any slogans or logos.

Brewers, like all business owners, gain trademark rights in a term simply by using the term.  However, unregistered “common law” trademarks only grant rights in the geographic area where the owner sells or ships its goods under that mark.  Trademark owners, like brewers, may consider registering their trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for additional benefits.  For example, federal registrations provide presumptive nationwide rights.  Brewers who search for registered trademarks to clear their own proposed marks may more easily discover registrations with the USPTO and then avoid using a potentially infringing proposed mark.  Also, if another company applied to register a trademark that the USPTO considered confusingly similar to a brewer’s existing trademark registration, the USPTO may refuse to register the later-filed mark, which benefits the registered trademark owner.  Registered trademark owners also benefit by being eligible to apply to record their trademarks with U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, which will help prevent importation of counterfeit or other infringing goods.

Before applying to register or use a trademark, it is prudent to hire counsel to conduct a trademark search.  Counsel will evaluate the risk that existing trademarks may present to registration or use of the proposed mark.  One of the common reasons that the USPTO rejects a trademark registration is that a “likelihood of confusion” exists with an already-registered trademark.  The USPTO, as well as the courts, evaluate likelihood of confusion not just with respect to identical products, like two types of beers, but also with related products.  Since trademarks cast this “shadow” over related goods, counsel may evaluate trademarks used not only on beer but also on wine, spirits, or other products or services, to review whether the trademark conflicts with any potentially related products or services.  While there is no rule that all alcohol beverage products are related, the USPTO does routinely find them to be related, and considerations like this factor into the trademark search analysis.  However, similarity of the products is only one factor in the likelihood of confusion analysis relevant to selecting a trademark.

When filing a trademark application with the USPTO, an applicant must indicate a filing basis.  A “use in commerce” filing basis requires that the trademark owner already uses the mark in interstate commerce.  An “intent-to-use” filing basis indicates that the applicant has a bona fide intent to use the trademark in interstate commerce.  Acquiring a COLA before applying to register a trademark can help support an intent-to-use filing if challenged later, so breweries may consider seeking a COLA before applying to register a trademark.

As an alternative to federal trademark registration, brewers may consider filing trademark applications at the state level.  To register a trademark at the state level, the application must meet the specific requirements of the particular state.

Check back next week for the next segment of our three-part series which will cover trade dress and copyright protections for beer labels.

Written with the assistance of Colleen Seidel, a summer associate in the Husch Blackwell LLP Washington, DC office.

Photo of Daan Erikson Daan Erikson

Daan advises Fortune 500 companies, startups and individual authors on trademark, copyright, right of publicity and right of privacy matters. Daan has gained high trust for his particular experience in managing domestic and international trademark portfolios and counseling clients with complex copyright issues.

Read more about Daan EriksonEmail
Photo of Emily Lyons Emily Lyons

Emily grew up on a northern Illinois dairy farm, and now helps clients bridge the gap from farm to fork. She guides clients on complex regulatory issues as they bring dairy products, beverages, fruits and vegetables, processed foods and other agricultural goods to…

Emily grew up on a northern Illinois dairy farm, and now helps clients bridge the gap from farm to fork. She guides clients on complex regulatory issues as they bring dairy products, beverages, fruits and vegetables, processed foods and other agricultural goods to market. At the intersection of agriculture, food and environment, Emily handles compliance matters such as labeling, marketing, permitting and agency inquiries including the Food Safety Modernization Act, Pasteurized Milk Ordinance, USDA National Organic Program and bioengineered food disclosure standard, Generally Recognized as Safe status for food additives and food contact substances, and the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65).

Read more about Emily LyonsEmailEmily's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Climate Solutions Legal Digest
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo