Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

How are Florida employers keeping up with ever-changing vaccine requirements?

By Scott Atwood on August 9, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Waitress in a maskIn keeping with his candidate promises, President Biden’s new appointees issued new COVID-19 regulations. Under the prior administration, the EEOC concluded an employer could require an employee to be vaccinated as a condition of employment. While subject to certain limitations, such as accommodations for medical conditions and religious objections, this was a significant win for employers as they tried to return to normalcy.

Lack of consistency among government agencies

The EEOC’s pronouncement was seen as giving employers the approval to encourage vaccination. BJ Zarvis of Pewter Mug restaurant, “I saw this information as a way to give me, my employees, and my customers some comfort knowing that they were coming to a safe place.”

But then OSHA, under the new Biden administration, announced that any employer that created a mandatory vaccination plan would be subject to OSHA reporting rules if there were any adverse effects from the vaccination. Any lost days would be reportable, which potentially subjects the employer to higher insurance rates and fines. “When I heard about OSHA’s position,” said Zarvis, “I decided it wasn’t worth it to make it mandatory.”

Luckily, OSHA’s position took considerable heat from the public, across the political spectrum, such that it finally announced it was rolling back its position and not making adverse effects from a mandatory vaccination program reportable. So employers like Zarvis can again consider the pros and cons of making vaccinations mandatory.

What is keeping employers from mandating vaccinations?

For some employers such as Dave Peck, who owns D. Peck Roofing, it’s a combination of things. “I had some employees who had just didn’t feel comfortable taking the vaccine, especially when they started to hear about some people have serious side effects. They said they would quit if they had to be vaccinated.” Peck says that the threat of losing his staff was a major consideration. “Labor is difficult to find,” said Peck. “I decided just to encourage vaccination. Most people got vaccinated, and we work outside and not around many customers, so I’m just hoping that will be enough to make the workplace safe.”

The experience of Peck and Zarvis is typical of employers, especially in Florida. Those employers who have a lot of customer interactions have the most daunting of tasks. On the one hand, they want to make their customers feel safe. On the other hand, they want employees. If they don’t have enough staff, they can’t serve customers anyway.

OSHA Guidance and Rules

Employers are again faced with government pronouncements that make COVID-19 policies difficult to implement. Upon ascension to the presidency, President Biden instructed OSHA to implement tighter COVID-19 safety rules to protect workers. Hence, the temporary guidance — as opposed to a rule – is still mandatory and can result in fines. The guidance, however, was followed by a statement that tougher rules were in the works. While many of my clients were anxiously awaiting what OSHA was going to do, they already stepped up enforcement under the rules already in place.

Stricter rules for the health care industry

VaccineThe new Rule finally made its appearance in mid-June 2021. Much to the delight of employers, and the dismay of safety groups, OSHA essentially punted. Rather than making the new more restrictive rule apply to industry in general, its scope has been limited to the health care arena. Health care is already under significant regulation. This is not as significant as placing heightened obligations on businesses like the hospitality industry.

This is attributable to the widespread success of vaccination. With so many people being vaccinated, there is pressure to eliminate all mandatory mask-wearing. These new regulations, while recognizing and limiting restrictions for vaccinated individuals, would have made that problematic.

Six months ago, few people were vaccinated. The President tried to show the importance of mask-wearing by making it mandatory at airports. Now, the public is seeking normalcy. It is anticipated the Biden administration will try to lever back restrictive regulations and instead begin to focus on post-COVID issues. In other words, expect the administration, and especially the new Labor Secretary (and former union leader) Walsh, to begin to work on their aggressive domestic agenda.

Insurgence of Delta variant

But just when things seemed to be moving away from COVID issues, the emergence of the Delta variant of COVID has caused the Biden administration to potentially have to hit the pause button. In late July, the CDC updated its recommendation for fully vaccinated people to wear a mask in public indoor settings in areas of substantial or high transmission. They also recommend universal indoor masking for all teachers, staff, students, and visitors to schools, regardless of vaccination status.

Employers needing guidance in this area may contact me at scott.atwood@henlaw.com or by phone at 239-344-1287.

Photo of Scott Atwood Scott Atwood

From complex labor and employment counseling and litigation to general business matters, Scott has been representing the interests of entrepreneurs, public entities, and businesses of all sizes throughout the United States, including Florida and Georgia, for nearly 25 years.

More specifically, Scott has…

From complex labor and employment counseling and litigation to general business matters, Scott has been representing the interests of entrepreneurs, public entities, and businesses of all sizes throughout the United States, including Florida and Georgia, for nearly 25 years.

More specifically, Scott has extensive experience in all aspects of employment law, including Title VII, ADA, ADEA, and Section 1983 discrimination, harassment, and retaliation matters, FMLA leaves issues, and FLSA and state law wage situations. He also assists his clients in whistleblower claims and non-compete, non-solicitation, trade secret, and contract disputes. With regard to general corporate matters, he prepares employment agreements, operating and shareholder agreements, restrictive covenant (non-compete, non-solicitation, confidentiality) agreements, and business contracts.

Scott also brings his expertise as a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil Mediator to facilitate a resolution as an alternative to lengthy and expensive litigation. As a member of the Executive Council of the Florida Bar’s Labor and Employment Section, Scott is extremely active in helping formulate and implement legal policy on both the state and local level. He is admitted to practice in all state and federal courts in Florida and Georgia, including U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Middle Districts of Florida.

Scott has been recognized as a Florida Super Lawyer in labor and employment law. Previously, he was recognized by Atlanta Super Lawyers as a Rising Star in labor and employment law. While attending law school, Scott was elected Editor-in-Chief of the Florida Journal of International Law and was awarded the President’s Award for outstanding service to the University. He now serves on the College of Law’s Alumni Council.

Scott has two children, Caroline and Laura. They both attended Fort Myers High School’s IB program, and Caroline is now attending Scott’s alma mater, Dartmouth. Scott is married to Kristalyn Loson Atwood, who is also an attorney. When not working, Scott enjoys spending time with his family, traveling, and watching New England sports.

Read more about Scott AtwoodEmailScott's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Featured Posts, Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Southwest Florida Business and IP Blog
  • Organization:
    Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo