Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Eco-friendly but not so taxpayer friendly: Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission finds automaker’s sale of environmental credits generates apportionable income

By Charlie Kearns & Annie Rothschild on December 20, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission sided with the Department of Revenue, ruling that American Honda Motor Co.’s sale of environmental credits generated apportionable income for corporate income and franchise tax purposes. American Honda bought vehicles from related companies and resold them to car dealerships and other retailers in the U.S.

When American Honda sold its environmental credits to other automakers, it reported the sale proceeds as non-apportionable income, sourced outside of Wisconsin. In analyzing whether the sales generated apportionable income, the Commission explained that under Wisconsin law, the income is apportionable if it is unitary income, operational income, or other income with a taxable presence in the state.  After determining that the income did not have a taxable presence in the state, the Commission found that the sales generated operational income because the credits were integral to American Honda’s unitary business and did not serve an investment function.  The Commission reasoned that the company earned the credits through its manufacture and distribution of fuel-efficient and low-polluting vehicles, which is the combined group’s unitary business activity. Further, if American Honda needed to use the credits in the future, they would be integral operational assets that would save the company the expense of meeting fuel efficiency and emissions standards. As such, the Commission concluded that the credits are integral to the company’s automating operations.

Next, the Commission ruled that American Honda’s income from selling the credits was also unitary income. The company’s activities to comply with federal environmental standards, which generated the credits, were unitary because they are “very much related” to the automaking business and benefit the combined group, which could use or sell the credits. The Commission noted that these compliance activities “are clearly functionally integrated” with the vehicle manufacturing activities to the benefit of the group. Because the unitary enterprise generates the credits and the sale of credits requires the coordination of company unitary resources, the sale of the credits generated apportionable income.

American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Wis. Dept. Rev., Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission Dkt. No. 19-I-227 (Nov. 29, 2021)

Photo of Charlie Kearns Charlie Kearns
Read more about Charlie KearnsEmail
Photo of Annie Rothschild Annie Rothschild
Read more about Annie RothschildEmail
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    SALT Shaker
  • Organization:
    Eversheds Sutherland LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo