Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

California Proposes New CBD Regulations & Registration Requirements

By Barak Cohen, Andrew Kline, Tommy Tobin & Elizabeth Gustafson on May 10, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

California enacted statute AB 45 in October 2021, authorizing the use of hemp and hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) in food, beverages, dietary supplements, and cosmetics at the state level. Now, state regulators have proposed new regulations to govern the state’s hemp-derived CBD market. Comments on the proposed regulations are due by May 31, 2022.

California’s proposed regulations primarily address new registration requirements for in-state industrial hemp manufacturers and out-of-state industrial hemp extract manufacturers. In-state manufacturers of extract, human foods (including beverages and dietary supplements), cosmetics and processed pet food products containing industrial hemp will need the appropriate registration for their respective products. Manufactures may be required to hold multiple registrations for each type of product manufactured if the proposed rule is adopted.

The new proposed regulations will require registration for manufacturing industrial hemp extract, foods, or cosmetics within the state of California. The proposed regulation will, however, differentiate between manufacturers of extract and manufacturers of foods or cosmetics: The regulations will specify new rules for out-of-state industrial hemp manufacturers of extract, while not specifying any such standards for out-of-state industrial hemp manufacturers of foods or cosmetics. Manufacturers of industrial hemp extract that intend to extract outside of California for import into the state will be required to obtain, maintain, and pay annual registrations with the state. 

The proposed regulations also refer to the manufacture of inhalable products. Statute AB 45 prohibited the manufacture or sale of inhalable industrial hemp products within California, except for the sole purpose of sale in other states. The new regulations will require manufacturers of inhalable products, as well as manufacturers of other products, to obtain and maintain an industrial hemp “enrollment and oversight authorization” for each location used for processing, manufacturing, packing, repacking, labeling, warehousing or holding hemp-containing products.

The California Department of Public Health is accepting comments through the end of May 2022 for the proposed rule. Agency guidance regarding the submission of comments can be found here. Since California statute AB 45 provides for agency authority to issue additional regulations regarding age restrictions and maximum serving sizes for hemp-derived cannabinoids, additional regulations may be forthcoming in the coming months.

Photo of Barak Cohen Barak Cohen

Barak Cohen represents two kinds of clients: companies and individuals facing government enforcement actions and investigations in highly regulated industries, particularly the healthcare and government contracting industries, and companies that need strategic business advice regarding compliance and regulatory matters in the cannabis industry.

Read more about Barak CohenEmail
Photo of Andrew Kline Andrew Kline

Andrew Kline leverages his more than thirty years of law and policy experience in his diverse practice. He counsels clients in established and emerging industries on regulatory compliance, due diligence, internal investigations, privacy, public policy, and litigation strategy.

Read more about Andrew KlineEmail
Photo of Tommy Tobin Tommy Tobin

Thomas Tobin’s practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and class action matters involving statutory, constitutional, and regulatory issues in a range of industries, including food and beverage, consumer packaged goods, and cannabis. In the food and beverage sector, Tommy has experience defending false…

Thomas Tobin’s practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and class action matters involving statutory, constitutional, and regulatory issues in a range of industries, including food and beverage, consumer packaged goods, and cannabis. In the food and beverage sector, Tommy has experience defending false advertising claims and consumer protection claims for well-known international corporations.

Read more about Tommy TobinEmail
Show more Show less
Elizabeth Gustafson

Elizabeth Gustafson has extensive experience with intellectual property and trademark litigation, antitrust, internal and government investigations, and breach of contract claims.

Read more about Elizabeth GustafsonEmail
  • Posted in:
    Cannabis
  • Blog:
    Cannabis Legal Highlights
  • Organization:
    Perkins Coie LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo