Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Chicago City Council Expands Sexual Harassment Laws

By Steven J. Pearlman, Edward Young & Dakota D. Treece on May 19, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Woman Holding Up Hand Stop

On April 27, 2022, the Chicago City Council passed Ordinance 2022-665 (the “Ordinance”) amending the Municipal Code to enhance the City’s prohibitions on sexual harassment in the workplace. The amendments include, among other things, modified definitions of “sexual orientation” and “sexual harassment,” a new written policy requirement for employers, increased sexual harassment prevention training requirements, and stricter penalties for violations.  The amendments take effect on July 1, 2022.

Amended Definition of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Orientation

The Ordinance amends the definition of sexual orientation in the Chicago Human Rights Ordinance, such that sexual orientation is now defined as “a person’s actual or perceived sexual and emotional attraction, or lack thereof, to another person.” The Ordinance also amends the definition of sexual harassment to include sexual misconduct.

Written Policy Requirements

Under the Ordinance, employers must now have a written policy that is provided to employees in their primary language within the first calendar week of employment.  The policy must include the following:

  • The definition of sexual harassment, which is defined in the Ordinance as “any (i) unwelcome sexual advances or unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature; or (ii) requests for sexual favors or conduct of a sexual nature when (a) submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual’s employment, or (b) submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for any employment decision affecting the individual, or (c) such conduct has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering with an individual’s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment; or (iii) sexual misconduct, which means any behavior of a sexual nature which also involves coercion, abuse of authority, or misuse of an individual’s employment position.”
  • A statement that sexual harassment is illegal in Chicago.
  • A requirement that all employees participate in sexual harassment prevention training annually.
  • Examples of prohibited conduct that constitute sexual harassment.
  • Details on (i) how an employee can report an allegation of sexual harassment (including, as appropriate, instructions on how to make a confidential report, with an internal complaint form, to a manager, corporate headquarters or human resources, or other internal reporting mechanism); and (ii) information about legal services, including governmental agencies, that are available to employees who may be victims or sexual harassment.
  • A statement that retaliation for reporting sexual harassment is illegal in Chicago.

Training Requirements

The Ordinance includes increased sexual harassment prevention training requirements.  Employees must participate in a minimum of one hour of sexual harassment prevention training annually, while managers and supervisors must participate in a minimum of two hours of sexual harassment prevention training annually.  Also, all employees must also participate in one hour of bystander training annually.

Posting and Recordkeeping Requirements

Employers must display, in at least one location where employees commonly gather, posters designed by the Commission on sexual harassment prohibitions.  Employers must display at least one poster in English and one in Spanish.

Employers also must retain written records of the policies and trainings given to each employee, as well as other records necessary to show compliance with the Ordinance, for a period of at least five years or the duration of any claim, civil action, or investigation pending pursuant to the ordinance, whichever is longer.  Failure to maintain the required records creates a presumption, rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence, that an employer violated the Ordinance.

Statute of Limitations

Employees will now have 365 days, instead of 300 days, to report all forms of discrimination, including sexual harassment, to the Chicago Commission on Human Relations.  In addition, in cases of sexual harassment, the Commission may delay issuing a complaint to the respondent for up to 30 days after it is filed.  (This is intended help to mitigate any retaliation such as a denial of a reasonable accommodation request under the Illinois Victim’s Economic and Security Act (VESSA)).

Potential Penalties

The Ordinance increases penalties for all forms of discrimination from the previous $500 – $1,000 per violation, to $5,000 – $10,000.

Conclusion

Employers with operations in Chicago should promptly revisit their anti-harassment and discrimination policies and practices to ensure compliance with the new amendments.

Photo of Steven J. Pearlman Steven J. Pearlman

Steven J. Pearlman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation Group. Steven’s practice focuses on defending complex employment litigation involving claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation; wage-and-hour laws; breach of employment contract…

Steven J. Pearlman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation Group. Steven’s practice focuses on defending complex employment litigation involving claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation; wage-and-hour laws; breach of employment contract; and restrictive covenants (e.g., non-competition agreements). Steven is also at the forefront of defending whistleblower retaliation claims, and routinely conducts investigations arising from whistleblower reports. He has successfully tried cases to verdict in Illinois, Florida and California, and defended what is reported to be the largest Illinois-only class action in the history of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. He has also testified in defense of his investigations in federal court.

Read more about Steven J. PearlmanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Edward Young Edward Young

Edward “Eddie” C. Young is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation and the Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Groups.

Eddie’s practice focuses on defending companies in all aspects of employment litigation, including…

Edward “Eddie” C. Young is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation and the Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Groups.

Eddie’s practice focuses on defending companies in all aspects of employment litigation, including claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation, breach of restrictive covenants (e.g., noncompetition and nonsolicitation), and whistleblower retaliation. He has handled such cases before state and federal courts throughout the country, as well as before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Illinois Department of Human Rights, the American Arbitration Association and the Department of Labor.

Read more about Edward YoungEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Dakota D. Treece Dakota D. Treece

Dakota earned her J.D. from DePaul University College of Law, where she was an Associate Editor for the DePaul Law Review and a teaching assistant for a constitutional law course and DePaul’s Academic Success Program. While at DePaul, she worked as a law…

Dakota earned her J.D. from DePaul University College of Law, where she was an Associate Editor for the DePaul Law Review and a teaching assistant for a constitutional law course and DePaul’s Academic Success Program. While at DePaul, she worked as a law clerk at a labor union and as a student attorney in the Misdemeanor Clinic. Dakota received the Dean’s Certificate of Service for her volunteer efforts while in law school and was awarded the highest overall grade in her labor law course.

Read more about Dakota D. TreeceEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Law and the Workplace
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Pro Policyholder
  • The Way on FDA
  • Crypto Digest
  • Inside Cybersecurity & Privacy Law
  • La Oficina Legal Ayala Hernández
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo