Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Illinois DOR Proposes to Change Income Tax Liability for Businesses that Make Sales to Foreign Countries

By Lauren Ferrante & David Blum on May 31, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Illinois Department of Revenue (“IDOR” or “Department”) recently issued a Notice of Proposed Amendment to amend its Regulation (86 Ill. Admin. Code § 100.3200) governing the “throwback” and “throwout” apportionment provisions (the “Amendments”). 46 Ill. Reg. ___ (Apr. 15, 2022), at 5856. If adopted, the Amendments would change the Illinois income tax burden imposed on a business by altering the business’ apportionment with respect to sales made into certain foreign countries.

If a business is subject to Illinois income tax, the business must both: (1) throwback to (i.e., include in its apportionment factor numerator)[1] its sales of tangible personal property delivered to a state where the business is not taxable; and (2) throwout of (i.e., exclude from) its entire apportionment factor (both numerator and denominator) sales of services that were received in a state where the business is not taxable.  35 ILCS 5/304(a)(3)(B)(ii), (a)(3)(C-5)(iv); see also 86 Ill. Admin. Code § 100.3370(c)(1)(A)(ii), (c)(1)(F), (c)(7)(D)(iv).

Currently, IDOR regulations interpret the statute to require taxpayers to throwback and throwout sales made into foreign countries where the taxpayer is not taxable as a result of a treaty provision. 86 Ill. Admin. Code § 100.3200(a)(2)(C). For taxpayers, depending on their facts and sales volume, this rule can have the effect of increasing or decreasing their Illinois tax liability.

The Amendments propose to amend the rules so that for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2021, taxpayers are not required to throwback and throwout sales made into treaty protected countries, so long as the taxpayer otherwise is taxable in that country.  In the Amendments, the Department states that it is proposing this change to align its rule with the Multistate Tax Commission Model Sourcing Rule, which likewise carves out from its throwback and throwout rules (see Reg. IV.16.(a)(1)(B), IV.17.(a)(6)(D)) sales made into treaty protected countries (Reg. IV.3.(c))

Throwback and throwout rules are generally bad tax policy, because they tax income that should not be attributed to the taxing state and are incongruous with market-based sourcing regimes enacted in many states and inconsistent with the tax determination of the destination state. While IDOR should be commended for narrowing the scope of these rules, the Amendments arguably do not go far enough as other states have repealed throwback and throwout entirely. Taxpayers affected by the Amendments should confirm the effect on their Illinois tax lability. Written comments to the proposed Amendments were due to IDOR by May 30th.

[1] Illinois uses a single sales factor only.

Photo of Lauren Ferrante Lauren Ferrante

Lauren Ferrante focuses her practice on state and local taxation. She represents clients at all stages of state and local controversy disputes at the audit, administrative and judicial levels. In particular, Lauren has extensive experience defending clients against qui tam (False Claims Act)…

Lauren Ferrante focuses her practice on state and local taxation. She represents clients at all stages of state and local controversy disputes at the audit, administrative and judicial levels. In particular, Lauren has extensive experience defending clients against qui tam (False Claims Act) claims filed in the state tax arena. Lauren also assists clients with planning, transactional, and compliance matters with respect to various state and local taxes, including income and franchise, sales and use, gross receipts and other miscellaneous taxes.

Lauren is a prolific author and speaker on state and local tax matters including apportionment, nexus and tax procedure as well as other state tax issues.

Read more about Lauren FerranteEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of David Blum David Blum

Ranked by Chambers USA for both taxation and tax controversy, David Blum provides transactional, tax planning, and tax litigation counsel to local and multinational businesses throughout the United States. His practice serves a variety of sectors, including telecommunications, automotive retail, equipment leasing, financial…

Ranked by Chambers USA for both taxation and tax controversy, David Blum provides transactional, tax planning, and tax litigation counsel to local and multinational businesses throughout the United States. His practice serves a variety of sectors, including telecommunications, automotive retail, equipment leasing, financial services, senior care, logistics, and retail, among others. David’s comprehensive multistate taxation practice includes nexus issues, income apportionment, sales and use tax, franchise tax, False Claims Act (qui tam), transfer taxes, and state registration and reporting requirements. In addition, he has significant experience in creating and implementing tax-efficient corporate and partnership structures for all types of U.S. and cross border transactions, including business start-ups, private equity, venture capital, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, dispositions, restructurings, intellectual property, and corporate finance matters

Read more about David BlumEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    SALT Insights
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo