Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

7th Circuit: Actual Denial of Leave Not Necessary for FMLA Interference Claim

By Steven J. Pearlman, Edward Young & Dakota D. Treece on June 15, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On June 1, 2022, the Seventh Circuit reversed the entry of summary judgment on a Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) claim, holding that an actual denial of an employee’s FMLA leave request is not necessary to constitute an FMLA violation. Rather, the FMLA may be violated where an employer discourages an employee from taking FMLA leave.  The case is Ziccarelli v. Thomas J. Dart, et al., No. 19-cv-3435.

Background

In September 2016, Plaintiff called his employer’s FMLA benefits manager to discuss taking some of his remaining FMLA leave to attend an 8-week post-traumatic stress disorder treatment program.  According to Plaintiff, his benefits manager urged him “[not to] take any more FMLA,” and said he would “be disciplined” if he did so.  Out of fear that he would be terminated for taking more FMLA leave, Plaintiff retired from his position.

Plaintiff filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging violations of Title VII, the ADEA, the ADA and the FMLA.  Plaintiff asserted that his rights under the FMLA were violated when Defendants discouraged him from taking leave.  The District Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, concluding that Plaintiff’s FMLA interference claim failed because he did not show an actual denial of FMLA benefits.  Plaintiff appealed the ruling as to his FMLA claims only.

Seventh Circuit’s Ruling

The Seventh Circuit reversed.  The court held that a violation of the FMLA does not require actual denial of FMLA benefits and, as such, a reasonable jury could find that Defendants’ interfered with Plaintiff’s remaining FMLA leave hours by threatening to discipline him for using them.  The court explained that the statutory text of § 2615(a)(1) of the FMLA undermines any requirement that an actual denial of leave must occur by explicitly prohibiting an employer from “interfering with, restraining, or denying” an employee’s rights under the FMLA.

Significance

This decision clarifies that an employer can, in fact, run afoul of the FMLA even if it does not outright deny an employee’s leave request.  Rather, discouraging an employee from taking FMLA leave may be sufficient to constitute a violation under the FMLA.

Photo of Steven J. Pearlman Steven J. Pearlman

Steven J. Pearlman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation Group. Steven’s practice focuses on defending complex employment litigation involving claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation; wage-and-hour laws; breach of employment contract…

Steven J. Pearlman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation Group. Steven’s practice focuses on defending complex employment litigation involving claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation; wage-and-hour laws; breach of employment contract; and restrictive covenants (e.g., non-competition agreements). Steven is also at the forefront of defending whistleblower retaliation claims, and routinely conducts investigations arising from whistleblower reports. He has successfully tried cases to verdict in Illinois, Florida and California, and defended what is reported to be the largest Illinois-only class action in the history of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. He has also testified in defense of his investigations in federal court.

Read more about Steven J. PearlmanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Edward Young Edward Young

Edward “Eddie” C. Young is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation and the Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Groups.

Eddie’s practice focuses on defending companies in all aspects of employment litigation, including…

Edward “Eddie” C. Young is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation and the Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Groups.

Eddie’s practice focuses on defending companies in all aspects of employment litigation, including claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation, breach of restrictive covenants (e.g., noncompetition and nonsolicitation), and whistleblower retaliation. He has handled such cases before state and federal courts throughout the country, as well as before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Illinois Department of Human Rights, the American Arbitration Association and the Department of Labor.

Read more about Edward YoungEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Dakota D. Treece Dakota D. Treece

Dakota earned her J.D. from DePaul University College of Law, where she was an Associate Editor for the DePaul Law Review and a teaching assistant for a constitutional law course and DePaul’s Academic Success Program. While at DePaul, she worked as a law…

Dakota earned her J.D. from DePaul University College of Law, where she was an Associate Editor for the DePaul Law Review and a teaching assistant for a constitutional law course and DePaul’s Academic Success Program. While at DePaul, she worked as a law clerk at a labor union and as a student attorney in the Misdemeanor Clinic. Dakota received the Dean’s Certificate of Service for her volunteer efforts while in law school and was awarded the highest overall grade in her labor law course.

Read more about Dakota D. TreeceEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Law and the Workplace
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Lawrina Blog
  • The FTI Award Journal
  • International Dispute Resolution
  • China Law Update Blog
  • Law of The Ledger
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo