Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Governor DeSantis’s COVID-19 Closings Not a Taking of Private Property

By Carlos Kelly on August 30, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

A large part of my law practice deals with “takings”—a situation where a government authority with the power to condemn, or a private entity with the power to condemn, has taken private property. Takings falls primarily into one of two large categories:

  1. “Direct takings,” which is when a government or private entity, like a utility, files a lawsuit to acquire private property through the court system; and
  2. “Inverse” or indirect condemnation, which is when a government or private entity has taken private property without using the court system.

In the case, Orlando Bar Group, LLC d/b/a The Basement, The Attic and the Treehouse v. DeSantis, the Fifth District Court of Appeal decided that Governor DeSantis’s executive orders from March 2020 did not amount to a taking of private property. Even though Governor DeSantis’s executive orders:

  • suspended all sales of alcoholic beverages by entities deriving more than fifty percent of their gross revenue;
  • suspended the sale of such beverages for on-premises consumption;
  • limited the operation of bars to seated service; and
  • restricted operational capacity to half of the typical occupancy previously permitted,

the Fifth DCA determined that those executive orders did not amount to a taking of private property.

As stated in the decision,

[u]nder the Florida Constitution, private property cannot be taken by the government unless it is for public use and the owner of the property is fully compensated.”

The Fifth DCA analyzed the factual situation under a variety of legal tests. Ultimately, the Fifth DCA determined that no physical taking of private property occurred, and determined that the limitation on the businesses was only temporary and, therefore, “not a complete or permanent loss of the ability to do business” and “the impact of the COVID orders does not amount to a compensable taking.”

The decision begs the question, “How long is temporary?”  In different circumstances, perhaps the Fifth DCA would have ruled differently. Time is valuable. The bar owners apparently think so, also, and have appealed to the Florida Supreme Court.

Photo of Carlos Kelly Carlos Kelly

Carlos represents business clients in partner/shareholder disputes, fraud and intentional interference claims, and various contract-based claims. He also represents clients in eminent domain, inverse condemnation, Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act claims, purchase and sale disputes, real estate broker/agent…

Carlos represents business clients in partner/shareholder disputes, fraud and intentional interference claims, and various contract-based claims. He also represents clients in eminent domain, inverse condemnation, Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act claims, purchase and sale disputes, real estate broker/agent defense, and commercial landlord/tenant claims.

Carlos received his undergraduate degree from Florida State University, magna cum laude, and his J.D. from Emory University. He may be reached at carlos.kelly@henlaw.com.

Read more about Carlos KellyEmailCarlos's Linkedin ProfileCarlos's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    The Legal Scoop on Southwest Florida Real Estate
  • Organization:
    Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo