Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Sticker Shock: FTC Enforces “Made in USA” Labeling Rule

By Amanda Beane, Tim Carter, Nathan Kosnoff & Wonji Kerper on August 31, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Key Takeaways:

  • On August 5, 2022, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a $2.8 million settlement with the marketers of Patriot Masks for allegedly deceiving consumers about the efficacy and country of origin of their personal protective products (PPE). Days earlier, in a similar action finalized on July 28, 2022, the FTC imposed over $200,000 in fines against the owner of a patriotic apparel company for swapping “Made in China” tags with “Made in USA” tags.
  • These two cases are the latest in an ongoing push by the FTC to curb false and deceptive “Made in USA” or COVID-19-related representations by individuals capitalizing on a pandemic-fueled demand for American-made products.

Exercising its authority under the FTC Act, the Made in USA Labeling Rule, and the COVID-19 Consumer Protection Act, the FTC announced on August 9, 2022, that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), on referral from the FTC, had filed suit to enjoin Adam J. Harmon; Axis LED Group, LLC; and ALG-Health LLC (Defendants) from making allegedly false and deceptive U.S.-origin labeling and advertising claims in connection with their offering of PPE and LED lighting products.

In its complaint, the FTC alleged that the Defendants, through their website, social media accounts, marketing materials, and product labeling, claimed that their products were all or virtually all made in the United States. In fact, as alleged by the FTC, the Defendants wholly imported and repackaged their products, including having employees peel off “Made in China” stickers and replace them with “Made in USA” stickers. The complaint also alleged that the Defendants falsely marketed their PPE products as being safer than other products and providing superior protection from COVID-19. Finally, the FTC alleged that as recently as 2016, Defendant Harmon was aware of and had acknowledged FTC guidance and caselaw concerning the standard for making legally compliant “Made in USA” claims after Defendant Harmon was subject to a previous FTC investigation.

The stipulated settlement order requires that the Defendants pay $157,683.37 in civil penalties and enjoins them from making false or misleading claims about their products, including (1) making any unsubstantiated claims about their products in connection with (a) the country of origin or (b) the treatment, cure, prevention, or diagnosis of COVID-19; and (2) making unqualified “Made in USA” claims unless they can show that both the final assembly and all or virtually all of the components of its products are made in the United States. The order also specifically requires that any qualified “Made in USA” claims include a clear and conspicuous disclosure about the amount of foreign parts, ingredients, components, and processing contained in the product, and for any “assembled” claim, that the product be last substantially transformed in the United States, its principal assembly take place in the United States, and U.S. assembly operations be substantial. Notably, the Defendants are subject to a suspended judgment of $2.8 million, which is premised on the Defendants’ asserted inability to pay.

In a similar action, the FTC finalized an order against Lions Not Sheep Products, LLC (Lions) and its owner for fraudulently advertising that their imported clothing was “Made in the USA” when it was wholly made in China. In its complaint, the FTC alleged the shirts were labeled with “Made in the USA,” “Made in America,” “Are your products USA MADE?” and other similar phrases. However, the business owner allegedly posted a video on Twitter with the caption “Made in America!” in which he said he covered up the fact that the shirts are manufactured in China by removing the tag and replacing it with his own “Made in the U.S.” tags. In its decision and order, the FTC required Lions and its owner to pay $211,335 in fines, stop making the “Made in USA” claims, and reveal the truth about foreign production.

The “Made in USA” Labeling Rule was approved in August 2021, giving the FTC the authority to impose civil penalties on businesses that make fraudulent claims. As discussed in our prior blog posts on this topic, the FTC’s continued focus on “Made in USA” violations makes clear that it considers halting deceptive “Made in USA” claims to be a key priority.

Photo of Amanda Beane Amanda Beane

Amanda Beane serves as co-chair of the Advertising, Marketing & Promotions practice.

Read more about Amanda BeaneEmail
Photo of Tim Carter Tim Carter

Tim Carter represents, counsels, and defends clients in intellectual property (IP), media, advertising, unfair competition, and consumer protection matters.

Read more about Tim CarterEmail
Photo of Nathan Kosnoff Nathan Kosnoff

Nathan Kosnoff has experience working on a broad range of matters, including intellectual property and trademark disputes, antitrust, construction defect litigation, campaign finance law, and government and internal investigations.

Read more about Nathan KosnoffEmail
Photo of Wonji Kerper Wonji Kerper

Wonji Kerper advises companies on mitigating intellectual property risks with an emphasis on matters involving trademark, copyright, internet, and advertising.

Read more about Wonji KerperEmail
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Consumer Protection Review
  • Organization:
    Perkins Coie LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo