Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

California Requires Disclosure of Pay Scales in Job Postings and Significant New Pay Data Reporting

By Kris D. Meade, Christopher J. Banks & Rebecca Springer on September 30, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On September 27, 2022, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 1162, which  requires employers with more than 15 employees to disclose pay scales to current employees and on job postings beginning January 1, 2023. The bill also requires private employers with more than 100 employees to submit significantly more pay data to the California Civil Rights Department (CRD, formerly known as the DFEH) beginning in May 2023.

Pay Scale Disclosure Requirements  

With SB 1162, California joins Colorado, Washington, and New York City in requiring employers with more than 15 employees to disclose the pay scale for a position in any job posting. “Pay scale” means the salary or hourly wage range that an employer reasonably expects to pay for the position. The bill does not specify how or if this requirement applies to postings for remote jobs that may or may not be performed in California. We expect the CRD to issue additional guidance on this and other key issues in the coming months.

The new law will also require employers to provide employees with the pay scale for their own position upon request. California already requires employers to provide job applicants with the pay scale for the position upon request. In addition, employers will now be required to maintain records of job titles and wage rate histories for employees for at least three years after separation.

An individual aggrieved by a violation of this law will be permitted to file a written complaint with the Labor Commissioner within one year of learning of a violation. Individuals will also be able to bring a civil action for injunctive relief or any other relief deemed appropriate by the court. The law allows the Labor Commissioner to order an employer to pay a civil penalty in the range of $100 to $10,000 per violation, based on the totality of the circumstances. The bill specifies that no penalty will be assessed for a first violation of failing to include a pay scale in a job posting as long as the employer updates the job postings.

Additional Pay Data Reporting Requirements

In 2021, California was the first state to require pay data reporting and Illinois followed with a similar law this year. While existing California law allows private employers with more than 100 employers to submit a federal EEO-1 report in lieu of a pay data report, the new law imposes more requirements, including the following:

  • Employers must include “within each job category, for each combination of race, ethnicity, and sex, the median and mean hourly rate.”
  • Employers must provide a separate pay data report covering workers hired through labor contractors. A “labor contractor” means an individual or entity that supplies, either with or without a contract, a client employer with workers to perform labor within the client employer’s “usual course of business.” The term “usual course of business” is not defined.

Employers with multiple establishments must continue to submit a report covering each establishment, but the new law eliminates the requirement that employers with multiple establishments submit a consolidated report. The law also moves the deadline for submitting reports from March of each year to the second Wednesday in May of each year, beginning in 2023.

The State is already entitled to recover costs associated with seeking an order of compliance with pay data reporting requirements. The new law increases potential exposure to employers, permitting courts to impose a civil penalty up to $100 per employee, and up to $200 per employee for subsequent violations. 

In order to prepare for these new reporting requirements, employers should review their reporting capabilities to ensure that they are able to compile the necessary data, including coordinating pay data reporting with any labor contractors. Employers should also consider conducting privileged pay equity analyses to identify any areas of potential concern under the California Equal Pay Act.

We expect that the CRD will update its FAQs to provide further guidance regarding the required pay scale disclosures, including any requirements for job postings for remote work that could be performed in California.

Photo of Kris D. Meade Kris D. Meade

Kris D. Meade is co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s Labor & Employment Group. He is also a member of the firm’s Management Board and Executive Committee. He counsels and represents employers in the full range of employment and traditional labor law matters, including…

Kris D. Meade is co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s Labor & Employment Group. He is also a member of the firm’s Management Board and Executive Committee. He counsels and represents employers in the full range of employment and traditional labor law matters, including individual and class action lawsuits filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, ERISA, and companion state statutes. Kris represents employers in connection with union organizing campaigns, collective bargaining, labor arbitrations, and unfair labor practice litigation. In 2020, Chambers USA recognized Kris as a leading labor and employment lawyer.

Read more about Kris D. MeadeEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Christopher J. Banks Christopher J. Banks
Read more about Christopher J. BanksEmail
Photo of Rebecca Springer Rebecca Springer

Rebecca Springer joined Crowell & Moring in 1999 and currently serves as partner in the Labor & Employment Group. Her practice focuses on labor and employment litigation and counseling, particularly in the area of Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) compliance. Rebecca…

Rebecca Springer joined Crowell & Moring in 1999 and currently serves as partner in the Labor & Employment Group. Her practice focuses on labor and employment litigation and counseling, particularly in the area of Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) compliance. Rebecca has extensive experience conducting audits of personnel practices, preparing Affirmative Action Plans, and counseling clients on affirmative action issues. She also has experience conducting statistical analyses of compensation and other personnel practices for purposes of class action litigation, OFCCP compliance audits, and employer self-audits, and frequently teams with labor economists to analyze compensation and advise clients on potential risks and proactive measures to address compensation disparities.

Read more about Rebecca SpringerEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo