Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

NLRB Ditches COVID Positivity Rates as Factor Justifying Mail Ballot Elections

By Eugene A. Boyle on October 3, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has updated the test to be used by its Regional Offices for determining whether purported safety concerns related to COVID-19 justify conducting a union election by mail ballot rather than by an in-person manual election.  In a move most employers view as long overdue, the NLRB will no longer review the 14-day trend in new reported cases and the local testing positivity rate, and will instead look to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Community Risk Tracker which designates counties as having “Low,” “Medium,” or “High” community transmission risk.  Starbucks Corporation, 371 NLRB No. 154 (Sept. 29, 2022).  Under the new test, mail ballots will ordinarily be ordered when the CDC’s tracker shows a “High” community risk level. A level of “Low” or “Medium” would not ordinarily warrant a mail ballot.  The new test should result in an immediate decrease in the number of mail ballot elections directed by the NLRB and a corresponding increase in the number of in-person manual elections.

In keeping with most other democratic institutions, in-person manual elections have long been the preferred means for determining whether employees desire union representation.  The preference is based both on higher participation rates in in-person elections held at the workplace and the simple recognition that manual voting that occurs in the presence of an NLRB agent is less susceptible to manipulation and, therefore, generally more reliable.  Since the onset of the pandemic in March of 2020, however, the NLRB has conducted 2432 mail ballot elections but only 521 manual elections.

The disparity can be tracked directly to the six-factor test the NLRB adopted in November of 2020 in Aspirus Keweenaw, 370 NLRB No. 45 (2020).  Under the Aspirus test, a mail ballot election would be ordered if any one of six enumerated factors were present.  The second factor  looked at whether the 14-day trend for newly reported cases in the county where the employer was located was “increasing” and whether the testing positivity rate over the prior 14 days was above 5 percent.  Factors such as the prevalence and effectiveness of vaccines and access to home testing had rendered these metrics unreliable predictors of transmission risk.  The CDC itself replaced these metrics with its current Community Risk Tracker in February.

In Starbucks, the NLRB has brought its mail ballot test back in line with current CDC thinking.  This change should result in fewer mail ballot elections which is a positive development for employers (and employees) facing union organizing drives. 

Photo of Eugene A. Boyle Eugene A. Boyle

Eugene A. Boyle is a Shareholder at Vedder Price and a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment practice area in Chicago.

Mr. Boyle counsels and defends companies nationally in all facets of labor and employment law, regularly advising employers across many industries

…

Eugene A. Boyle is a Shareholder at Vedder Price and a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment practice area in Chicago.

Mr. Boyle counsels and defends companies nationally in all facets of labor and employment law, regularly advising employers across many industries on a broad spectrum of employment law issues.

Read more about Eugene A. BoyleEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Vedder Works
  • Organization:
    Vedder Price PC
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo