Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Another Preliminary/Postliminary Case: What The Employer Need Be Aware Of!

By Mark Tabakman on January 20, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
delivery van

Working time cases, especially those claiming pay for preliminary or postliminary work are difficult and dangerous because they sneak up on an employer.  These activities may seem minimal, or not connected to the main job as to be part of it (in the employer’s view) but under the FLSA, that may not be the case.  A recent class action filed against an Amazon “last-mile” delivery entity is illustrating these principles. The case is entitled Dixon v. Regional Express Clev Inc. et al., and was filed in federal court in the Northern District of Ohio.

The named plaintiff alleges that he and other putative class members were compelled to come in early for mandatory meetings; they also had to pick up their truck keys and gasoline cards before they left the facility.  They were not paid for this time and assert that the “defendants did not pay plaintiff and the class all wages earned for all work performed at the beginning and ends of their shifts and work performed during missed and interrupted meal breaks.”

The named plaintiff was a driver, who worked for only a few months.  He claims that he and other drivers worked beyond the end of their shifts, making deliveries, but were not paid for this time.  He claims it could take up to an hour.  He also makes the “integral and indispensable” argument in the Complaint, asserting that he could not do delivery work without the truck keys and money for gasoline.  

He also alleges that the workers did not get a full, uninterrupted, thirty minute lunch break.  He claims the Company put pressure on drivers to take the meal break, because they would not be able to make all of their rounds and deliveries.  He asserts that even if they worked through lunch, the Company’s policy if automatically deducting that half-hour kicked in and they were (again) denied proper compensation.  He seeks class certification under the FLSA and Ohio law. 

The Takeaway

This might be a case where a de minimis argument actually works, in whole or part.  Picking up the keys and getting a gas card—is that all of the preliminary activity being alleged.  How long can that take?  One minute?  Two?  Now, if pre-shift meetings were also held (and not paid for) then the de minimis argument does not seem that compelling.

It’s certainly worth a try…

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Wage & Hour - Developments & Highlights
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Employment Class Actions: A General Counsel Briefing
  • U.S. Legal Insights for Korean Businesses
  • Latin American Blog
  • Intellectual Property Law Blog
  • Insurance Law Blog
Copyright © 2023, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo